Thermal hydraulic design of nuclear reactor core

  • Thread starter Nucengable
  • Start date
42
0
By a simple procedure , what should I do when I'm going through the thermal hydraulic design of nuclear reactor core...?
..
I put initial guesses for the core dimensions ( fuel , clad , gap , length)
initial guess for the fuel element pitch
desired power ...
I've found q'' critical heat flux based on the correlation in "Nuclear Systems I - Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals - Todreas"
I've found q'max ( based o DNB =1.3 )
q'avg based on ( hot spot factor =2 )
and based on q'max I've found the temperature distribution in one single fuel rod
...
The results
after assuming
we have only 1 assembly inside the core that produces 17.6 MWth
All fuel rods have the same enrichment
the reflector will take care of the leakage

to produce the desired power we need
188 fuel rods inside the assembly
Rf = 0.405 cm (fuel pellet radius)
Tg = 0.005 cm (gap thickness)
Tc = 0.05 cm (clad thickness)
Lr = 360 cm (fuel rod length)
fuel element pitch (p) = 1.3 cm
Pressure 15.5 Mpa

with coolant flux flow rate 436 kh/hr.cm2 in one single channel
I've found that
ΔTF ( temperature drop through the fuel pellet) = 1656.5 C
ΔTg ( temperature drop through the gap) = 511.3 C
ΔTC ( temperature drop through the clad) = 95 C
ΔTC ( temperature drop through the coolant) = 18 C
..
does this sounds correct because I sill don't have that sense of the numbers...!!
 

Chronos

Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,398
737
Re: Reactor design

I believe Westinghouse has some data you may find useful.
 

Astronuc

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,553
1,677
Re: Reactor design

By a simple procedure , what should I do when I'm going through the thermal hydraulic design of nuclear reactor core...?
..
I put initial guesses for the core dimensions ( fuel , clad , gap , length)
initial guess for the fuel element pitch
desired power ...
I've found q'' critical heat flux based on the correlation in "Nuclear Systems I - Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals - Todreas"
I've found q'max ( based o DNB =1.3 )
q'avg based on ( hot spot factor =2 )
and based on q'max I've found the temperature distribution in one single fuel rod
...
The results
after assuming
we have only 1 assembly inside the core that produces 17.6 MWth
All fuel rods have the same enrichment
the reflector will take care of the leakage

to produce the desired power we need
188 fuel rods inside the assembly
Rf = 0.405 cm (fuel pellet radius)
Tg = 0.005 cm (gap thickness)
Tc = 0.05 cm (clad thickness)
Lr = 360 cm (fuel rod length)
fuel element pitch (p) = 1.3 cm
Pressure 15.5 Mpa

with coolant flux flow rate 436 kh/hr.cm2 in one single channel
I've found that
ΔTF ( temperature drop through the fuel pellet) = 1656.5 C
ΔTg ( temperature drop through the gap) = 511.3 C
ΔTC ( temperature drop through the clad) = 95 C
ΔTC ( temperature drop through the coolant) = 18 C
..
does this sounds correct because I sill don't have that sense of the numbers...!!
188 fuel rods per assembly is close to the number for a 14x14 assembly, and a typical power level would be 13.6 MW/assembly for a 14x14 assembly, 14.5 to 25.7 MW/assembly for a 15x15 assembly, ~16.5 MW/assembly for a 16x16 assembly, and 17.7 to 18.6 MW/assembly for a 17x17 assembly. The smaller the diameter, the more limiting the heat flux for a given set of coolant flow rate, saturation temperature, coolant pressure and core hieght.

Some published fuel design data are found in: http://www.neimagazine.com/journals/Power/NEI/September_2004/attachments/NEISept04p26-35.pdf [Broken]



Some typical PWR fuel design numbers are:
Code:
Lattice    LP   FR   GT  IT   FOD    GAP    CID    COD   PITCH  

 14x14   196  176  20   1  0.928  0.020  0.948  1.072  1.43
 15x15   225  204  20   1  0.928  0.020  0.948  1.072  1.43
 16x16   256  232  24   1  0.911  0.019  0.93   1.075  1.43
 17x17   289  264  24   1  0.819  0.017  0.836  0.95   1.263
 18x18   324  300  24   1  0.805  0.017  0.822  0.95   1.263
LP = number of lattice positions
FR = number of fuel rods
GT = number of guide tubes
IT = number of instrument tubes (optional) - one guide tube may serve as IT

FOD = fuel pellet outer diameter (OD)
GAP = diamteral fuel cladding gap
CID = cladding inner diameter (ID)
COD = cladding outer diameter (OD)
PITCH = distance between centers of adjacent fuel rods. (need to verify for 16x16)

For fuel rods, there is considerable variation for diametral/radial dimensions within the fuel rod, i.e., dimensions within the cladding envelope.

Guide Tube OD ~ Pitch - spacer grid strip thickness

Typical core height ~ 3.66 m (12 ft) or 4.27 m (14 ft)

Plenum height ~ 18-20 cm for 3.66 m core

See - EUR 20056 EN, Main Characteristics of Nuclear Power Plants in European Union and Candidate Countries
ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/studies/doc/other/eur20056.pdf
A1.3.6 Technical Data for REP900, page 84 of 163

For REP 900 (3 coolant loops, 157 assembies/core)
Code:
Core inlet temp         286°C
Core outlet temp       323°C
Tsat                       345°C
Psat                       155 bar
Core inlet pressure    157-158 bar
Coolant mass flux      ~3500-3600 kg/m2-s
Pressure drop - core  ~1.9 bar
Typical fuel centerline temperature 900-1400°C
 
Last edited by a moderator:
42
0
Re: Reactor design

Thank you very much
 

Related Threads for: Thermal hydraulic design of nuclear reactor core

  • Posted
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
4K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top