Engineering Thermodynamics, Calculating the required mass flow

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the required mass flow for cooling a power plant using air. The specific heat capacity of air is noted as 1.005 kJ/kg*K, and the power output is given as 850 MW, equating to 850,000 kJ/s. The calculation performed by the user yielded an unrealistic mass flow rate of 84,577 kg/s, prompting concerns about the feasibility of cooling a power plant solely with air. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the context of the problem and the assumptions made in the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of specific heat capacity (cp) in thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with mass flow rate calculations
  • Knowledge of power plant cooling systems
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions (kW to kJ/s)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research cooling tower design and operation principles
  • Study the implications of using air as a cooling medium in power plants
  • Learn about thermodynamic calculations involving specific heat capacities
  • Explore realistic mass flow rates in industrial cooling applications
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, thermodynamics students, and professionals involved in power plant design and cooling system optimization will benefit from this discussion.

bardia sepehrnia
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
1-A power plant generates 150 MW of electrical power. It uses a supply of 1000 MW from a geothermal source and rejects energy to the atmosphere through a cooling tower.
Determine:
a) The rejected power to the atmosphere in MW
b) How much air should be flowed to the cooling tower (kg/s) if its temperature cannot be increased more than 10C.
Relevant Equations
Qin-Qout=W
Q=m*cp*(T2-T1)
I have solved this question and it seemed pretty easy, but I got an extremely large number for the mass flow, I had to post the question here to make sure I did it correctly. Any help will be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    103.5 KB · Views: 186
Physics news on Phys.org
Two Three Four things.

I see a calculation that is hard to decipher:

The 1 in cp= 1.00##\zeta## looks like a 7.​
Your k and K look exactly the same​
And how can 8.5 105 kJ/s divided by 10 kJ/kg yield 17 106 kg/s ? Did you check your math ?​

The last one is more about the exercise: cooling towers evaporate water, they are not air cooled heat exchangers.

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Two Three Four things.

I see a calculation that is hard to decipher:

The 1 in cp= 1.00##\zeta## looks like a 7.​
Your k and K look exactly the same​
And how can 8.5 105 kJ/s divided by 10 kJ/kg yield 17 106 kg/s ? Did you check your math ?​

The last one is more about the exercise: cooling towers evaporate water, they are not air cooled heat exchangers.

##\ ##
The question is kind of vague so I had to assume lots of things but it clearly says in question: "how much air has to flow... "and when it says :'its temperature", the question is referring to air's temperature. So I'm pretty sure it's being cooled by air.

The cp (specific heat capacity at constant pressure) of air is 1.005kJ/kg*K
The 850MW is 850*10^3 kW.

I can see I messed up the math. So (850*10^3 [kJ/s])/(1.005[kJ/kg*K]*10[K])=84577kg/s
But the mass flow is still unrealistically large.
 
I agree it's unrealistic, but the math is as it is. Also, your answer suggests an unrealistic precision.

But it is unrealistic to cool a power plant with air only, and that is the responsibility of the problem composer, not yours.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes bardia sepehrnia
BvU said:
I agree it's unrealistic, but the math is as it is. Also, your answer suggests an unrealistic precision.

But it is unrealistic to cool a power plant with air only, and that is the responsibility of the problem composer, not yours.

##\ ##
Ok. Thank you for the help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K