Thermodynamics, Callen's problem, it doesn't make sense to me

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the internal energy dependence of a single-component system described by the equation U=APV^2 for two moles, where A=10 cm-3. Participants clarify that doubling the system's volume and mole number does not alter pressure, leading to the conclusion that U=BPV^2/N, with B=20 cm3. Misunderstandings regarding unit consistency and the relationship between variables were addressed, ultimately confirming the correctness of the derived equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, specifically internal energy.
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law and its implications on pressure, volume, and temperature.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis to verify unit consistency in equations.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills to derive relationships between variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of internal energy equations in thermodynamics.
  • Learn about the implications of the ideal gas law on internal energy calculations.
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques for verifying physical equations.
  • Research the concept of free expansion in thermodynamics and its effect on internal energy.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, educators teaching thermodynamic principles, and anyone involved in physics or engineering who seeks to understand the relationship between internal energy, pressure, and volume in single-component systems.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283

Homework Statement


Two moles of a particular single-component system are found to have a dependence of internal energy U on pressure and volume given by U=APV^2 (for N=2) where A=10cm ^{-3}. Note that doubling the system doubles the volume, energy, and the mole number but leaves the pressure unaltered, and write the complete dependence of U on P, V and N for arbitrary mole number. Answer: U=BPV^2/N where B=20 cm ^3.


Homework Equations


Not sure there are any. To be found.


The Attempt at a Solution


First I tried to understand the problem and makes sense of the given expression U=APV^2. I checked out the units in SI units and instead of joule I reach Jm^2. So that this expression doesn't make sense to me, I cannot even proceed further.
The book is considered of one of the most cited apparently for thermodynamics so I'm sure the book is right and I'm missing something. I just don't know what I'm missing, any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fluidistic said:
First I tried to understand the problem and makes sense of the given expression U=APV^2. I checked out the units in SI units and instead of joule I reach Jm^2.
How'd you get that?
 
vela said:
How'd you get that?
By forgetting to divide the force by the area in the pressure expression. :smile:
 
I don't know how to reach the answer. Attempt:
Let V_0 be the volume when n=2. So that V(n)=\frac{V_0 n}{2} (linear relation). P is constant. I do the same relation for U(n): U(n)=\frac{U_0 n}{2}.
The relation they provide becomes U_0=APV_0^2. Written with my terms I get U(n)=\frac{2APV^2(n)}{n}=\frac{APnV_0 ^2}{2}.
Something is definitely wrong, I shouldn't be able to get a dependence of U only in terms of n.
I've tried other things but reached nothing like the result.
 
fluidistic said:

Homework Statement


Two moles of a particular single-component system are found to have a dependence of internal energy U on pressure and volume given by U=APV^2 (for N=2) where A=10cm ^{-3}. Note that doubling the system doubles the volume, energy, and the mole number but leaves the pressure unaltered, and write the complete dependence of U on P, V and N for arbitrary mole number. Answer: U=BPV^2/N where B=20 cm ^3.


What's confusing is the statement that doubling the system doubles U, n and V, yet the formula seems to suggest that doubling the system quadruples U, since it seems that if V' = 2V, so U' = 10p(2V)^2 = 40pV2 = 4U. But this is not what the problem states: it states that U just doubles & we have to accommodate that fact:

Oops! I nearly did it again, giving the complete solution.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your help. But I think that's what I've done in my last post. I don't see anything wrong with my answer.
When n=2 I get the given relation. When I duplicate n, I get twice the same energy and the volume duplicates too; the pressure remaining the same just as it should. Yet my answer differs from the one given (worth apparently \frac{200PV^2}{An} if I write it in terms of A rather than B.)
 
fluidistic said:
I don't know how to reach the answer. Attempt:
Let V_0 be the volume when n=2. So that V(n)=\frac{V_0 n}{2} (linear relation). P is constant. I do the same relation for U(n): U(n)=\frac{U_0 n}{2}.
The relation they provide becomes U_0=APV_0^2. Written with my terms I get U(n)=\frac{2APV^2(n)}{n}=\frac{APnV_0 ^2}{2}.
Something is definitely wrong, I shouldn't be able to get a dependence of U only in terms of n.
I've tried other things but reached nothing like the result.[/QUOTE

EDIT! EDIT! EDIT!

fluidistic - I don't know how to tell you this, but your answer was always correct:
U(n) = {2ApV2(n)}/n is correct and agrees with the answer the OP gave us!

*****************************************************************

I'll give OP a lead: U(n) = (10pn/2)V2(2)
but V(2) = 2V(n)/n so
U(n) = (10pn/2){2V(n)/n}2

You wind up with the given answer.

While I'm at it:it makes sense, does it not, that doubling the volume does not change the internal energy? For example, in a free expansion where no work is done and no heat is added or subtracted.
 
Last edited:
Ok rude man, thanks for helping me. I am the OP in case you didn't notice :smile:
If my answer U(n)=\frac{2APV^2(n)}{n} is right and the answer provided by the textbook is (written in terms of A instead of B) \frac{200PV^2}{An} which is right by definition, how would one shows they are equivalent?
To me, this would mean that 2A=200/A. Wait, that means A=10 (I didn't check out the units though) which is... RIGHT!
Wow.
Problem solved!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alam
fluidistic said:
Ok rude man, thanks for helping me. I am the OP in case you didn't notice :smile:
If my answer U(n)=\frac{2APV^2(n)}{n} is right and the answer provided by the textbook is (written in terms of A instead of B) \frac{200PV^2}{An} which is right by definition, how would one shows they are equivalent?
To me, this would mean that 2A=200/A. Wait, that means A=10 (I didn't check out the units though) which is... RIGHT!
Wow.
Problem solved!

Yep, and my apologies for thinking you were not the OP! :blushing:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
727
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
660
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K