Thin cylinder under internal pressure - hyperelastic?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on verifying hyperelastic models in ANSYS using uniaxial simulations and comparing them to analytical solutions for thin-walled cylinders under internal pressure. The equations provided relate the hyperelastic energy function W to stress (\sigma) and pressure (p), specifically \(\sigma = \lambda \frac{\partial W}{\partial \lambda}\) and \(p = \frac{\sigma h}{r}\). Discrepancies between analytical results and simulation outputs are noted, prompting a request for confirmation on the correctness of these relationships. The discussion also references index notation for relating Cauchy stress to principal stretch, highlighting potential issues with incompressible material assumptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hyperelastic material models in FEA
  • Familiarity with ANSYS simulation software
  • Knowledge of Cauchy stress and principal stretch relationships
  • Basic principles of thin-walled cylinder mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of hyperelastic energy functions in ANSYS
  • Study the application of index notation in solid mechanics
  • Explore incompressible material behavior in finite element analysis
  • Investigate analytical solutions for thin-walled cylinder stress under internal pressure
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and researchers working with finite element analysis, particularly those focusing on hyperelastic materials and structural mechanics of thin-walled cylinders.

adlh01
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to verify that some hyperlastic models I got from uniaxial data work in ANSYS. To do so, I am using a one-element uniaxial simulation (which works perfectly), and then I also wanted to do a simulation of another type of problem that I could solve analytically, to compare the results with a simulation of the same problem.

I'm using, as a guideline, a thesis written a few years ago by a professor's colleague. In it, the equations given to relate the hyperelastic energy function W to the stress and pressure are:

\sigma = \lambda \frac{\partial W}{\partial \lambda}

p = \frac{\sigma h}{r}


These aren't really sourced on the text nor have I seen them elsewhere. I'm getting some discrepancies between results obtained through the equations and results obtained through the simulations, regardless of which W function I use. I'm wondering if anyone can confirm that these relationships are correct?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
what are p, h, and r in your second formula?
Looks kind've like the simple formula for hoop stress of a thin-walled cylinder.. but aren't we talking about a FEA model?


The common way to relate the cauchy stress and the principal stretch is in index notation:
\sigma_i=\frac{1}{\lambda_j \lambda_k}\frac{\partial W}{\partial \lambda_i}

It is derived in Appendix C.3 here: http://utsv.net/solid-mechanics/appendix

Is this the same as what you wrote? In general, definitely not. However, perhaps for an incompressible material? If that's the case, however, I'd expect to see some pressure term in that relation., kind've like equation 2 here: http://utsv.net/solid-mechanics/hyperelasticity/phenomenological-and-micromechanical-models


Hope that helps
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K