What is the limit of lnx as x approaches a negative number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nipuna Weerasekara
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Click For Summary
The limit of ln(x) as x approaches a negative number does not exist because the natural logarithm is undefined for negative values. The discussion highlights confusion around limits, specifically lim(x->0) ln(x) and lim(x->0) 1/x^n, noting that these limits approach infinity. It is clarified that the right-handed limit of ln(x) is defined, while the left-handed limit is not. Participants suggest that the original question may contain a printing error, but the consensus is that the limit for negative values of x is undefined. Overall, the key takeaway is that ln(x) cannot be evaluated for negative inputs.
Nipuna Weerasekara
Messages
36
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the following limit.

Homework Equations


Capture3.JPG

The Attempt at a Solution



I cannot apply L' Hopital rule because it does not apply to this question. Hence I have no idea how to approach to this question. Please give me some guidelines.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is lim(x->0) lnx? What is lim(x->0) 1/x^n?
 
  • Like
Likes Nipuna Weerasekara
Math_QED said:
What is lim(x->0) lnx? What is lim(x->0) 1/x^n?
I already know the answer to this and it is zero but I do not know how it comes.
For your question, lim (x->0) lnx is infinity and lim(x->0) 1/x^n is again infinity.
But I do not find any help from these two.
 
Nipuna Weerasekara said:
I already know the answer to this and it is zero but I do not know how it comes.
For your question, lim (x->0) lnx is infinity and lim(x->0) 1/x^n is again infinity.
But I do not find any help from these two.

The answer is not zero.
And more specifically, what kind of infinity are the limits above I asked for? I also forgot to mention the following very important thing: lim(x->0) lnx is NOT defined. The right handed limit is defined though.
 
  • Like
Likes Nipuna Weerasekara
Math_QED said:
The answer is not zero.
And more specifically, what kind of infinity are the limits above I asked for? I also forgot to mention the following very important thing: lim(x->0) lnx is NOT defined. The right handed limit is defined though.
I think The question has some printing mistake or so. However thanks for your kind concern.
 
Nipuna Weerasekara said:
I think The question has some printing mistake or so. However thanks for your kind concern.

The answer is that the limit does not exist since lnx is undefined for negative numbers. The right handed limit can be obtained by splitting the limit in 2 separate limits by using lim x>a fg = (lim x>a f )*( lim x>a g).
 
  • Like
Likes Nipuna Weerasekara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K