This question is driving me nuts. (counter-balancing forces)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leid_X09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Nuts
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving counter-balancing forces in a system with a man's leg and cast, weighing 210 N, and a counterbalance weight of 105 N. The objective is to determine an unknown weight, w2, and the angle required to ensure no force is exerted on the hip joint.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss summing forces in the system and converting forces into x and y components. There are attempts to establish equilibrium conditions and form equations based on the forces acting on the system. Some participants express confusion regarding the calculations and the relationship between the weights and angles involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to sum forces in both x and y directions. There is recognition of potential oversight in calculations and assumptions about the geometry of the situation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific information, such as the length of the leg, which adds to the complexity of the problem. There is also mention of potential confusion arising from the angles used in the calculations.

Leid_X09
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am new. I need someone to help me out with this question, because I've spent the last hour and a half trying to figure this out. I have an exam tomorrow and this question might be asked. Here it is:

A man's leg and cast weigh 210 N (center of the mass). The counterbalance weighs 105 N. Determine the weight, w2 and the angle needed so that no force is exerted on the hip joint by the leg plus the cast.

There is a diagram showing a man's leg being raised at a 40 degree angle by a wire and pulley on the right, on the end of it is a 105 N weight. On the other side (left), there is another wire pulley with an unknown weight, w2, attached to it at an unknown angle as well. Here is the diagram:

http://www.webassign.net/sercp/p4-18alt.gif

How do I even begin this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First sum up all of the forces that are acting in the system. Make sure you get your positive and negative symbols correct.

Hint:Convert every force to an x and y plane equivelant.

The key to solving this is remembering that the sum of all forces must equal 0 because it is in equilibrium. Using this, you should be able to form two simultaneous equations. Let me know how you go.
 
okay. i pretty much had a hunch that this what they wanted.

w1 triangle:

r1 = 105/sin40 = 163.4
y1 = 105
x1 = cos40 x 163.4 = 125.2

the x1 value should be the same as the x2 value, if T-T=0 so:

x2 = 125.2

and this is where I am stuck. I suppose i could use 210 as the height of the triangle, which gives me 244, but then what? I receive an angle approximate to 59.2 degrees by taking the inverse cosine of 125/244. However, then i get w2 as 210 N, which is clearly wrong. Insight?
 
You are right in thinking that the two x values must be equal (and opposite).

Remember I said sum up all the forces. You did that for x, now for y.

You have the weight of his leg pushing down, the y tension of w1 pushing up and the y tension of w2 pushing up too.

Therefore you can get the equation:
210 = 105 + w2
 
That's exactly what I was thinking, Rake, but the answer for this question is stating that the w2 is not 105, but actually 163.8. I can't figure out where they got that value, because I kept getting 105 for w2.
 
I'm sorry I was up all night, perhaps seek someone's second opinion because I'm sure I overlooked some tiny little thing.
 
Oh hang on, how did I not see this. The force of 210N is not going straight down from his leg. Well essentially it is, but his hip can't just drop straight down, it's a joint. Therefore there will be a torque created.
But I wouldn't suppose there's a length given of his leg?
 
Nope. No length. Lol. This is why this question is driving me nuts.
 
Heheh, Serway strikes again. Be careful, if you don't use a standard angle for many problems, the signs can become quite confusing.

This is in a chapter strictly concerning forces, so not torque problems yet.

Your idea seems correct, so it may be a matter of checking your work.

w_x_1 + w_x_2 =0

220 = (105*\sin(140)) + w_y_2<br />

Now use |w_2| = \sqrt{w_x + w_y} to find your magnitude and \theta = \tan^{-1} \frac{y}{x}
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I figured it out. I was thinking the side of the triangle with the weight, or the y of the triangle was 105 when it was actually the r. it makes sense now, since that's where the tension should have been.

So if r = 105, cos40*105 = 80.43 for x, which in turn is 80.43 on x2 because of T-T'=0.

If I get the sin40*105, the y is 67.5.
210 (force acting downward) - 67.5 = 142.5 for y2.
142^2 + 80.43^2 = 26775. Square that and you come to your answer of what the weight must be: 164 N.
 
  • #11
voila
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
20K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K