Thought Experiment: Spaceship, Photon, and Relativity Explained in Simple Terms

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a spaceship, light sensors, and the implications of special relativity, particularly focusing on time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity. Participants explore how the timing of events is perceived differently from various frames of reference, specifically addressing the synchronization of clocks on a moving spaceship.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario with a spaceship moving at 0.5 m/s and questions how the clocks on the spaceship can differ by one second while also being subject to time dilation from an external observer's perspective.
  • Another participant explains the concept of Lorentz contraction, noting that the spaceship's length appears shorter in the observer's frame and discusses how this affects the timing of events as perceived by different observers.
  • This participant also introduces the relativity of simultaneity, stating that the clocks on the spaceship, while synchronized in its own frame, appear out of sync from the observer's frame, with clock A reading ahead of clock B before the photon hits.
  • A third participant reiterates the importance of the relativity of simultaneity, emphasizing that the clocks are not synchronized from the observer's perspective and that this affects the readings when the clocks stop.
  • One participant acknowledges a missed consideration regarding the synchronization of clocks during the spaceship's acceleration, thanking others for their detailed explanations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the significance of the relativity of simultaneity and its implications for the synchronization of clocks on the moving spaceship. However, there remains some uncertainty and exploration regarding the exact timing differences and how they manifest in different frames of reference.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the synchronization of clocks during acceleration and the dependence on the definitions of simultaneity and time dilation in different frames. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

Chatt
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I was thinking of this thought experiment the other day and it didnt quite seem to make sense to me. I hope some of you can explain it. I have drawn a quick example of the setup:
experimentlys.jpg

and sorry for my english

(c = 1 m/s)

Imagine a 1 meter long spaceship with a velocity of 0,5 m/s (c/2). The spacesip has two light sensors attached to it, one in the front and one in the back. Each of these sensors has clocks attached to them (A and B on the drawing) and when the sensors register a photon the clocks will stop. The clocks are synchronized and they tick once each second.

Now imagine a photon coming towards the spaceship ofcourse with a velocity of c (1 m/s). It hits the first sensor and clock (B) stops. The photon continues through the spaceship and hits the other sensor and clock (A) stops. Now since the speed of light must always be the same for all observers the two clocks must now differ by one second.

But here is my question,.. according to SR the clocks on the spaceship ticks slower (from our point of view) because they are moving, and if the clocks has to differ by one second, time must go 'faster' (and definitely not slower) for the moving spaceship..


thx in advance for an answer,, and sorry for not expressing me perfectly.. pls ask if you have any questions yourself
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chatt said:
(c = 1 m/s)

Imagine a 1 meter long spaceship with a velocity of 0,5 m/s (c/2).
Remember, the ship's length in its own rest frame is different from its length in our frame because of Lorentz contraction. If the ship's speed is 0.5c in our frame, then its length in our frame is shrunk by [tex]\sqrt{1 - 0.5^2}[/tex] = 0.866 relative to its rest length, so if the length is 1 meter in its own frame, it must only be 0.866 meters in our frame.
Chatt said:
The spacesip has two light sensors attached to it, one in the front and one in the back. Each of these sensors has clocks attached to them (A and B on the drawing) and when the sensors register a photon the clocks will stop. The clocks are synchronized and they tick once each second.

Now imagine a photon coming towards the spaceship ofcourse with a velocity of c (1 m/s). It hits the first sensor and clock (B) stops. The photon continues through the spaceship and hits the other sensor and clock (A) stops. Now since the speed of light must always be the same for all observers the two clocks must now differ by one second.
In the ship's own frame they will differ by one second. But are you familiar with the relativity of simultaneity? If the clocks were synchronized and a distance d apart in the ship's rest frame, then in our frame if the ship is moving at speed b along the axis between the clocks, according to our frame's definition of simultaneity the clocks were out-of-sync by vd/c^2, with the trailing clock's reading being ahead of the front clock's reading by this amount. So, in this case, before the clocks stopped we would observer the clock at the back of the ship (A) to be ahead of the clock at the front (B) by (0.5 meters/second)*(1 meter)/(1 meter/second) = 0.5 seconds.

So, suppose the light hits the front (B) at time t=0 in our frame, and at position x=0.866 meters. Since the ship is 0.866 meters long in our frame, this means the back clock (A) is at position x = 0 meters at time t=0 in our frame. If clock B shows a time of T=10 seconds when the light hits it, that means clock A shows a time of T=10.5 seconds at the same moment in our frame (t=0) because of the relativity of simultaneity.

Now if the light's position at t=0 is x=0.866 meters, then the light's position as a function of time will be x(t) = 0.866 - 1*t, since the light is moving in the -x direction at 1 meter/second. Meanwhile, if the back clock's position at t=0 is x=0, then the back clock's position as a function of time will be x(t) = 0.5*t, since the back clock is moving in the +x direction at 0.5 meters/second. So, to figure out when the light hits the back clock in our frame, we set these equal and solve for t:

0.866 - 1*t = 0.5*t
1.5*t = 0.866
t = 0.577.

So in our frame there are only 0.577 seconds between the light hitting B and the light hitting A, since B and A were less than 1 meter apart in our frame and A was rushing forward to meet the light. According to the time dilation formula, clock A will only have ticked forward by 0.866 * 0.577 seconds in this time (since it's ticking slower by a factor of 0.866), which works out to 0.5 seconds. And as I mentioned, because of the relativity of simultaneity, in our frame A already read 10.5 seconds at the "same moment" (according to our frame's definition of simultaneity) that B read 10 seconds and was stopped by the light hitting it, so by the time the light reaches A and stops it, it will have advanced forward to 10.5 + 0.5 = 11 seconds. So you see, if you take all these factors into account--the fact that the rod is shrunk in our frame, the fact that A is moving towards the light in our frame, the fact that the clocks A and B are out-of-sync by 0.5 seconds in our frame prior to either one being stopped, and the fact that the clocks are running slow in our frame--then you end up with exactly the same prediction as you made in the rod's rest frame, namely that B reads 10 seconds when it stops while A reads 11 seconds.
 
The answer is in the Relativity of Simultaneity.

While from the ships point of view the Clocks are synchronized, they are not from our point of view. From our point of view, clock A actually reads a time later than clock B does. So even though clock A ticks off less than one sec from the time clock B stops, when it stops, it will read a one second difference from clock B.
 
Ah,,, I forgot to take into account that when the spaceship accelerated from 0 to 0,5c the clocks got out of synch..


Well, many thanks JesseM for the quick yet very detailed answer ^^ you too Janus!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K