Three Plate Capacitor and Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a three-plate capacitor setup, where a central plate is suspended between two outer plates. The objective is to determine the force acting on the central plate based on its position and the configuration of the capacitor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the idea of modeling the system as two capacitors and discuss the energy associated with the configuration. Questions arise regarding the correct expression for the electric field between the plates and the implications of charge density on the central plate. There is also a request for clarification on the geometrical setup and potential differences involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their interpretations and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of virtual work to analyze the forces involved. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the derived expressions or the assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clarity in the original problem statement, particularly regarding the potential difference and the geometrical configuration. There are also concerns about the definitions of charge density and its application to the central plate.

schaefera
Messages
208
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is basically question 3.18 in Purcell. You have a plate being suspended into the middle of two other plates, and then you need to determine the force downward on the hanging plate given that the separation between it and either side of the other conductor is s; the plates have length b; the amount of the inside dangling plate between the other two is height y.


Homework Equations


F= (1/2)Q^2 * d/dx(1/C)


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm trying to say that this thing acts as two capacitors side by side, but only for the distance y by which it is dangling down. Since U= (1/2)CV^2, the total energy of the system is 2*(1/2)*C*V^2, and C=(by)/(4*pi*s). So I get the total energy as a function of capacitance; I differentiate the energy to get the force on it, and in the end I find that:

F= -bV^2/(4*pi*s).

Is this right?
Can the field between the plates be determined as 4*pi*sigma, or is it 2*pi*sigma since the center plate really has 2*pi*sigma amount of charge per area on each side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
schaefera said:
F= -bV^2/(4*pi*s).

Is this right?

That's what I get also. Doesn't guarantee it's correct of course.
Can the field between the plates be determined as 4*pi*sigma, or is it 2*pi*sigma since the center plate really has 2*pi*sigma amount of charge per area on each side?

I'm not following the statement "...the center plate really has 2*pi*sigma amount of charge per area on each side". Suppose sigma is the charge density on each of the outer plates. What would be the charge density on each face of the inner (center) plate?
 
Last edited:
You haven't given the potential difference between the two outer plates. You also nebulously describe the geometrical setup. If s is the disatance between the cente and either outer plate, what is y again??

It would be much preferable if you quoted the problem verbatim.
 
Here's the setup. As you can see, the two outer plates are actually part of one bent sheet. The problem refers to Eq. 27 of the text which is F = \frac{Q^2}{2}\frac{d}{dx}(\frac{1}{C}).
 

Attachments

  • Prob 3-18 Purcell.jpg
    Prob 3-18 Purcell.jpg
    31 KB · Views: 593
Oh, how a picture is worth a thousand words!

Hint: invoke virtual work! i.e. F*Δy = Δenergy in the E fields.
 
I did exactly that. It would appear we already found the solution, but thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K