Three quantum mechanics questions (about Uncertainty p. and comp. conjugate)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
8 replies · 2K views
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
See attached images.
Relevant Equations
##\Delta p \Delta x \geq \frac{h}{4\pi}##
1.jpg Is the last inequality correct? Should it not be ##|A|^2 \cdot 2(1+\cos{(ka)})##?2.jpg How is the time calculated here? Given ##\Delta v > 10^{-34}##...3.jpg How come ##mv \Delta v = \Delta (\frac{mv^2}{2})##? Where does the ##(1/2)## come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You are correct. Book solution is a mess
2. It's your homework: what's the relevant equation here ? (hint: see 3)
3. Simple differentiation

You should know by now PF homework fora require posted efforts, but I'm convinced you did your part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen
schniefen said:
Homework Statement: See attached images.
Homework Equations: ΔpΔx≥h4πΔpΔx≥h4π

View attachment 252715 Is the last inequality correct? Should it not be |A|2⋅2(1+cos(ka))|A|2⋅2(1+cos⁡(ka))?View attachment 252716 How is the time calculated here? Given Δv>10−34Δv>10−34...View attachment 252717 How come mvΔv=Δ(mv22)mvΔv=Δ(mv22)? Where does the (1/2)(1/2) come from?

I must be honest, I don't buy this "uncertainly in the passage of time". What on Earth does that mean?

The Δt in the time-energy uncertainty relation is the time it takes the system to change in some defined way.

In QM, time is a parameter about which there is no uncertainty as such.
 
It's an 'order of magnitude' exercise :rolleyes:
 
Regarding 3, ##mv \Delta v=\Delta (mv^2)##, but where does the last equality follow from?
 
schniefen said:
Regarding 3, ##mv \Delta v=\Delta (mv^2)##, but where does the last equality follow from?
If you extend that notion of a differential to a derivative, with respect to time, then all should be clear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: schniefen
Why would ##\Delta t > \frac{4\pi(\Delta x)^2}{h}## give the time it takes for ##\Delta x## to double? Where is the factor ##2\Delta x##?
 
schniefen said:
Why would ##\Delta t > \frac{4\pi(\Delta x)^2}{h}## give the time it takes for ##\Delta x## to double? Where is the factor ##2\Delta x##?
The logic is that the uncertainty in ##x## has an associated minimum uncertainty in momentum, hence energy; and you apply the energy-time uncertainty relation.

Have you tried that?
 
schniefen said:
Why would ##\Delta t > \frac{4\pi(\Delta x)^2}{h}## give the time it takes for ##\Delta x## to double? Where is the factor ##2\Delta x##?
The logic is this. You start with an uncertainty in ##x## in the classical sense. You apply the HUP to get an uncertainty in ##v##. You interpret this as a classical uncertainty. You multiply the uncertainty in ##v## by ##\Delta t## to get a further, classical, uncertainty in ##x##.

You want to find ##\Delta t## where the additional uncertainty in ##x## equals the initial uncertainty.

That looks nothing like the QM I know. What book is that?