Throwing a Coin: Calculating the Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivu0
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 14K views
pivu0
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You throw a coin into a well, 1.5 seconds later you hear a splash

the acceleratoin is g, 9.81 m/s², the beginnig speed is 0


Homework Equations



x= x0 + v0t + (at²)/2

The Attempt at a Solution



x= 0+0+ (9.81*1.5²)/2

x= 11.04 m


Yet this is not the sulotion.
I think I have to use the speed of sound into the equation (340m/s right?), however I have no idea where I have to do this...
 
on Phys.org


The coin didn't fall for 1.5 seconds, it fell for some time t1 and then it took some time t2 for the sound to travel back to you. t1+t2 = 1.5seconds. The distance it fell is equal to the distance sound will travel in t2 seconds (speed of sound *t2). When you set it up, you'll have 2 equations and 2 unknowns; after solving for t2, multiply that by the speed of sound to get the answer...
 


x= 0+0+(9.81*t1²)/2

x=t2*speed of sound

x=x

(9.81*t1²)/2=t2*speed of sound

so (9.81*t1²)/ (2*speed of sound)= t2

1.5s= t1+t2
1.5s= t1 + ((9.81*t1²)/ (2*speed of sound)


Like this?
 


Anyone? Is this correct?
 


Yes I do :)

It takes the coin 1.469 s to reach the bodom and the sound does 0.031s for reaching the top again!

The well is 10.59m deep :)
 


Well done - ;)
It's amazing how many people will get an answer almost correct - make a little mistake but then happily write down any riduculous answer that their calculator tells them without any further thinking!
 
Last edited:


mgb_phys said:
It's amazing how many people will get an answer almost correct - make a little mistake but then happily write down any riduculous answer that their calculator tells them without any further thinking!
Are you talking about the answer in the OP, or the answer in post #6? The answer in post #6 looks correct to me.
 


D H said:
The answer in post #6 looks correct to me.
Yes, I was congratulating the OP on actualy checking that the answer was reasonable rather than just writing it down, following from my previous question.
Somebody in another question wrote an answer like t=1234567890.12345678901234567890 and said it must have been correct because they used Matlab to get all the decimal places!



Sorry reading the reply now it isn't clear ! I should have said that it was correct.
 


Thank you all!

It's not that hard if you think about it.

It's just that I'm used to using a equation directly after hearing a problem, I should first think it easy, Like the 1.5s= t1+t2 and that they both have the same x...