Throwing a projectile so that it clears the window

  • Thread starter Thread starter negation
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectile Window
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the initial speed and angle required to throw a package from a height of 1.6 m to a window located 4.1 m above the ground, while standing 3.0 m away from the wall. The context is projectile motion, specifically focusing on the conditions for the projectile to just clear the window.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the vertical and horizontal components of the projectile's motion, questioning how to determine the initial velocity and angle without assuming a specific angle. Some suggest breaking the problem into components, while others express confusion about the implications of reaching the apex of the trajectory.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations of the problem, with participants offering different equations and approaches to find the initial velocity and angle. Some have provided calculations for the vertical component, while others are attempting to reconcile their findings with the original poster's requirements. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of specific equations, but no consensus has been reached on the overall approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in the values used for height and distance, indicating a need for clarity on the problem's parameters. There is also mention of potential arithmetic errors affecting the calculations.

negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Standing on the ground 3.0 m from the wall of a building, you want to throw a package from your 1.6 m shoulder level to someone in a second-floor window 4.1 m above the ground

a)At what speed should you throw the package so it just barely reaches the window?
b) At what angle should you throw the package so it just barely reaches the window?

I know how to solve it conceptually but the workings are causing me problems mainly because I am asked to determine the 2 crucial unknowns.

The Attempt at a Solution



Assuming the projectile crosses the window at the apex of the trajectory.

vyf = vyi -gt
0 = vyi -9.8t
t = vi sin Θ/g

y(vi sin Θ/g) = y(0) +vi.t - 0.5gt^2
y(vi sin Θ/g) - y(0) = (vi sin Θ)(vi sin Θ/g) - 4.9(vi sin Θ/g)^2
2.7 = [(vi ^2 sin^2Θ)/g] -4.9[(vi^2 sin^Θ)/g^2]

I cannot assume Θ= 45 because part b asked for the angle. However, without knowing the angle, I cannot determine the initial velocity-self-contradictory, if you ask me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a very obvious question is it. I think it's looking for when it has no vertical speed, what else would barely reaches the window mean? In that case it's not to bad.
Vertical component:
s=2.5 u=? v=0 a=-9.81 t=? s=vt-0.5at^2, 2.5=-0.5*-9.81*t^2, t=0.714, also can find using other suvat equation u=7.

Solve for horizontal using t=0.714 find that u=4.20

overall magnitude=(7^2+4.2^2)^0.5=8.16.
Angle=tan^-1(7/4.2)=59 degrees.
 
You don't need to assume an angle. You just need to break it up into 2 parts initial velocity in y, and then in x.

Initial velocity in y would the speed needed to reach 2.5m(from the shoulder). And x is a little more tricky, you need to realize that it will reach its apex half way through its journey in x, which you would want it to travel 6m before returning to the height it was thrown from.
 
Darren93 said:
It's not a very obvious question is it. I think it's looking for when it has no vertical speed, what else would barely reaches the window mean? In that case it's not to bad.
Vertical component:
s=2.5 u=? v=0 a=-9.81 t=? s=vt-0.5at^2, 2.5=-0.5*-9.81*t^2, t=0.714, also can find using other suvat equation u=7.

Solve for horizontal using t=0.714 find that u=4.20

overall magnitude=(7^2+4.2^2)^0.5=8.16.
Angle=tan^-1(7/4.2)=59 degrees.


V=0? Is v the initial speed? If so, it doesn't make sense.
I'll work on it tonight.
 
V= 0 would be the velocity at its apex.
 
The velocity in y that is.
 
MostlyHarmless said:
The velocity in y that is.


At the apex yes. That would be the final velocity using vyf^2 -vyi^2 =2g(yf-yi)
But the other poster was using the equation
Yf= yi + vyi.t -0.5gt^2 and denoting vyi =0
 
Well, obviously you know that the initial velocity can't be 0. But yes, I would definitely use the formula you just posted, there is no reason to use time if you don't have to.
 
MostlyHarmless said:
Well, obviously you know that the initial velocity can't be 0. But yes, I would definitely use the formula you just posted, there is no reason to use time if you don't have to.

0 = vyi^2 = 2(-9.8)(4.2-1.5)
vyi = 7.27 ms^-1

The answer to part (a) is apparently 8.3ms^-1

What is wrong here?
 
  • #10
That's only the y component, now find the x component.
 
  • #11
Also the numbers you used 4.2 and 1.6 should be 4.1 and 1.6 according to the op.
 
  • #12
MostlyHarmless said:
That's only the y component, now find the x component.

That explains. I've to find the y and x component and find the magnitude, right?
I think there's another way to determine the y-component and that is to find the height of the trajectory.
However, from sources, it says, in using the height trajectory formula, the time, t = vyi/g must be substitute into y = yaverage velocity x t. Doesn't it make more sense to sub time into y(t) = y(0) + vi.t - 0.5gt^2?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
In the same time period, t = vi sinΘ/g, the projectile moves a horizontal distance of
x = vi.t = vi cosΘ(vi sinΘ/g), am I right?
 
  • #14
MostlyHarmless said:
Also the numbers you used 4.2 and 1.6 should be 4.1 and 1.6 according to the op.

In the same time period, t = vi sinΘ/g, the projectile moves a horizontal distance of
x = vi.t = vi cosΘ(vi sinΘ/g), am I right?
It should be right but apparently, there are too many unknown variables.

x = vi^2 sin(2Θ)/2g
x = 3m and g = 9.8 but I have no knowledge of Θ and vi

3 m = vi^2sin(2Θ)/2g
vi^2 sin(2Θ) = 58.8
Unable to proceed further.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
It should be right but apparently, there are too many unknown variables.

You haven't used the height. I think if you write another equation using the height it will work out but I haven't tried.
 
  • #16
Edit
 
Last edited:
  • #17
CWatters said:
You haven't used the height. I think if you write another equation using the height it will work out but I haven't tried.

It's the same thing. They both give me the same y-component value.
The tricky part is to solve for the x-component.
I know vyi = 7.27.
In order to determine the numerical time value, I sub vyi into y(t) = vi.t -0.5gt^2
The quadratic equation is 2.7 = 7.27t - 4.9t^2
The equation cannot be solve because the value to be square root is a negative.
 
  • #18
Solved. I made a arithmetic error.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K