Tight binding in cubic crystals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the tight binding method for band structure calculations in cubic crystals, referencing Ashcroft and Mermin's work. Participants analyze the integrals related to the parameters \(\beta_{ij}\) and \(\gamma_{ij}(R)\), emphasizing the implications of cubic symmetry on these calculations. The orthonormality of atomic orbitals is confirmed as the reason for \(\beta_{xy} = 0\), while the diagonal nature of \(\gamma_{ij}(R)\) is also questioned and explored. Key insights include the relationship between cubic symmetry and the integrals involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the tight binding method in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with cubic symmetry and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of integrals involving wave functions and potential energy terms
  • Experience with orthonormality of atomic orbitals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the tight binding method in detail using Ashcroft and Mermin's "Solid State Physics"
  • Research cubic symmetry and its mathematical implications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of orthonormal wave functions in quantum systems
  • Investigate the significance of diagonalization in tight binding models
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and graduate students engaged in solid-state physics, particularly those focusing on band structure calculations and the tight binding method.

torehan
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
\phiHi all,

I would like to make band structure calculations with tight binding method and I start reading about this method from Ashcroft - Mermin, Chapter 10: The Tight Binding Method and try to solve the problems at the and of the chapter.

In problem 2
a. As a consequence of cubic symmetry, show that

\gamma_{ij}(R)=- \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{i}(\vec{r})\psi_{j}(\vec{r}-\vec{R}) \Delta U(\vec{r})
\beta_{ij}= \gamma_{ij}(R=0)


\beta_{xx}= \beta_{yy}=\beta_{zz}=\beta_

and \beta_{xy}=0

So to calculate the \beta_{xx} ;

\beta_{xx}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{x}(\vec{r})\psi_{x}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} x^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})

\beta_{yy}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{y}(\vec{r})\psi_{y}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} y^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})

\beta_{zz}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{z}(\vec{r})\psi_{z}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} z^{2} \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})


These must be equal to but I couldn't see any equalities as all of the integrals has difference in their integrands as x2 , y2 and z2.
And also \beta_{xy} must be zero as a concequence of cubic symmetry.

\beta_{xy}= - \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{x}(\vec{r})\psi_{y}(\vec{r}) \Delta U(\vec{r})= - \int d\vec{r} xy \left| \phi \right|^{2} \Delta U(\vec{r})
Is it a concequence of orthanormality of atomic orbitals or what?

Is there anyone who could help me understanding integrals?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your \beta_{xy} = 0 is a consequence of orthonormality of your orbitals. Notice your integrand has xy in it. When you do your integral over dx the function \Delta U will be even, and the function x is odd, so you are integrating the product of an even function with an odd function over all x. This will give you zero.

Think about what cubic symmetry means for integrals like \beta_xx and \beta_yy. The key point is that it's *cubic* symmetry. What does that mean? How does x relate to y and z?
 
kanato said:
Think about what cubic symmetry means for integrals like \beta_{xx} and \beta_{yy]. The key point is that it's *cubic* symmetry. What does that mean? How does x relate to y and z?

It smells like \pi / 2 rotational symmetry for each axes but.. still not clear.
 
Yeah.. what happens to your coordinate system if you rotate by 90 degrees about some axis. If you rotate around z, it will transform x into y and y into -x. So take your \beta_{xx} and rotate the coordinate system used in the integral. You should see it becomes exactly the integral in \beta_{yy}
 
Yes, now it's more clear.
Thanks for your constructive talk.

Know another question appers..
In simple cubic crystal for the first 6 nearest-neighbor;
\gamma_{ij}(R)=- \int d\vec{r} \psi^{*}_{i}(\vec{r})\psi_{j}(\vec{r}-\vec{R}) \Delta U(\vec{r})
must be diagonal.
I made some calculations for \gamma_{xy} in attached the document.

Is it diagonal for the same reason?
 

Attachments

  • Adsız.jpg
    Adsız.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 766

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K