I Understand Tight Binding Method: Coulomb Potential, 2D Case & More

says
Messages
585
Reaction score
12
I'm trying to understand the tight binding method but I'm struggling with a lot of the mathematical formalism. A lot of the mathematical formalism I read jumps into explaining it a few too many steps ahead of where my understanding is.

I understand it's an approach to calculating the band structure in solids.

[(-ħ2/2m)∇2 + V(r)]Ψ = EΨ

Coulomb potential for a hydrogen atom:

V(r) = -e2/4πϵr

Right now I'm imagining a 2D case where hydrogen atoms are lined up in a row. The electron in question experiences a coulomb potential from other atoms in the crystal.

i V(r - Ri)

This will tell us what all the other coulomb potentials are. When we expand it out we get V(r) [the coulomb potential the electron experiences from it's own nucleus] and V(Ri) - [the potential the electron experiences from the nucleus of nearby atoms]

[(-ħ2/2m)∇2 + ∑i V(r - Ri)] = EΨ

This only describes what the energy of 1 electron is. From here I get a bit confused with it all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With each tight-binding wave function, you can get a wave function with a given ## \vec{k} ##. You can combine a bunch of them with a Slater determinant type wave function so that the many particle wave-function is anti-symmetric w.r.t. the interchange of two particles. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slater_determinant
Perhaps this is helpful. ## \\ ## To calculate the electron density at position ## x ## using a multi-electron wave function, you take e.g. (for 3 electrons) ## \int \Psi^*(x,x_2,x_3)\Psi(x,x_2, x_3)\,dx_2\, dx_3 +\int \Psi^*(x_1,x,x_3)\Psi(x_1,x, x_3) \, dx_1 \, dx_3+\int \Psi^*(x_1,x_2,x)\Psi(x_1,x_2,x) \, dx_1 \, dx_2 ##, where ## \Psi(x_1,x_2, x_3) ## is the Slater determinant wave function. With the Slater determinant wave function, these 3 integrals are equal, so you only need to compute one of them, and then you multiply by ## N ##.
 
Last edited:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top