Time Averages and Phasors in Electrical Circuits

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff1evesque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phasors Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of phasors in analyzing an AC circuit containing a resistor and a capacitor in parallel. Participants explore the implications of using conductance (denoted as "G") instead of resistance (R), the derivation of current equations, and the phase relationships between current and voltage in the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that "G" denotes conductance, which is the inverse of resistance, and that Ohm's law can be expressed as I = GV.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the treatment of GV as a constant, with some arguing that since V is variable, GV cannot be constant.
  • Participants discuss the derivation of the phasor form of the current, with some expressing confusion about how to transition from the time domain to phasor representation.
  • One participant notes that the current through the capacitor is 90 degrees out of phase with the voltage, while the current through the resistor is in phase.
  • There is a question about the absence of the imaginary "j" term in certain equations, leading to a discussion about the relationship between derivatives and the imaginary unit in phasor analysis.
  • Some participants suggest that elements involving derivatives, such as capacitors, tend to have imaginary components, while resistive elements do not.
  • One participant introduces the concept of the Laplace transform, explaining how it relates to the treatment of derivatives and integrals in electrical circuits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the phasor representation and the implications of using conductance. There is no consensus on the treatment of GV as a constant or the role of the imaginary unit in the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the derivation steps and the transition between time-domain equations and phasor representation. The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of AC signals and their mathematical treatment, which remain unresolved.

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Current and Phasors

Statement:
A simple circuit is given, such that the AC power source "V" is in parallel with a resistor "G" (why would it be denoted by G instead of R?), and also parallel with a capacitor "C".


Relevant equations:
Converting the circuit to phasors, the current from the source is given by:
I = GV + C\frac{dV}{dt} = GV + j\omega CV (#1)

I know I = \frac{V}{R}, C\frac{dV}{dt} are equations of ohm's law for a resistor and capacitor respectively. I also know by Kirchhoff's law the sum of the

"branches" is equal to the main source.


My Question:
I am not sure what the symbol "G" denotes (in my notes I wrote that G = 1/R), nor sure how to get the second equality in equation (#1). I wrote in my notes that GV is a

constant so there is no derivative of it. But how do we take the phasor form (and derivative?) of GV + C\frac{dV}{dt}

thank you,



JL
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


jeff1evesque said:
Statement:
A simple circuit is given, such that the AC power source "V" is in parallel with a resistor "G" (why would it be denoted by G instead of R?), and also parallel with a capacitor "C".


Relevant equations:
Converting the circuit to phasors, the current from the source is given by:
I = GV + C\frac{dV}{dt} = GV + j\omega CV (#1)

I know I = \frac{V}{R}, C\frac{dV}{dt} are equations of ohm's law for a resistor and capacitor respectively. I also know by Kirchhoff's law the sum of the

"branches" is equal to the main source.


My Question:
I am not sure what the symbol "G" denotes (in my notes I wrote that G = 1/R), nor sure how to get the second equality in equation (#1). I wrote in my notes that GV is a

constant so there is no derivative of it. But how do we take the phasor form (and derivative?) of GV + C\frac{dV}{dt}

thank you,



JL

G is the notation for conductance, the inverse of resistance. Ohm's law can be written
V = RI
or
I = GV.
GV is not a constant, since V is variable. To derive GV, follow the rule of derivation of a function (V) multiplied by a constant (G).
 


CEL said:
G is the notation for conductance, the inverse of resistance. Ohm's law can be written
V = RI
or
I = GV.
GV is not a constant, since V is variable. To derive GV, follow the rule of derivation of a function (V) multiplied by a constant (G).

I almost understand, but I still don't know how the phasor form from my question.
 
Last edited:


jeff1evesque said:
I almost understand, but I still don't know how the phasor form from my question.

The current GV is in phase with the voltage. The current j \omega CV is 90 degrees out of phase with the voltage.
 
I'm guessing that's the same as writing \frac{Vcos(\omega t + \theta - 90\circ)}{\frac{1}{\omega C}} = \frac{Vsin(\omega t + \theta)}{\frac{1}{\omega C}}?
Thanks
 
Last edited:
But why is there no imaginary "j" term in the notation above to match j\omega CV?. I've derived the equation above by assuming the power source is given by the equation Vcos(\omega t). Since the current though a capacitor is defined by C\frac{dV}{dt}, then we can write C\frac{d(Vcos(\omega t))}{dt} = \frac{Vsin(\omega t + \theta)}{\frac{1}{\omega C}}}.
 
Last edited:
jeff1evesque said:
But why is there no imaginary "j" term in the notation above to match j\omega CV?. I've derived the equation above by assuming the power source is given by the equation Vcos(\omega t). Since the current though a capacitor is defined by C\frac{dV}{dt}, then we can write C\frac{d(Vcos(\omega t))}{dt} = \frac{Vsin(\omega t + \theta)}{\frac{1}{\omega C}}}.

Because j\omega corresponds to \frac{d}{dt}
 
CEL said:
Because j\omega corresponds to \frac{d}{dt}

So anything involving derivatives (rates), in particular capacitors only have imaginary components? And anything that doesn't involve derivatives, such as resistors- like lightbulbs or whatever- only have real components? If this is true, do you mind explaining why that is so?

Thanks so much,JL
 
Last edited:
jeff1evesque said:
So anything involving derivatives (rates), in particular capacitors only have imaginary components? And anything that doesn't involve derivatives, such as resistors- like lightbulbs or whatever- only have real components? If this is true, do you mind explaining why that is so?

Thanks so much,


JL

Not only elements involving derivatives. Elements involving integrals too. In the case of electrical elements, these involve capacitors and inductors.
If you apply the Laplace transform to an integro-differential equation, the derivatives become s and the integrals, 1/s, where s = \sigma + j\omega is the Laplace variable.
The real term \sigma corresponds to the transient response, while the imaginary term j\omega corresponds to the steady state response.
If you are interested only in the steady state, you replace s by j\omega .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K