Time constant of a discharge RC circuit, capacity and charge

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the time constant (τ) of a discharge RC circuit using the discharge equations for two different time instants. Participants emphasize the importance of shifting the time origin to simplify the equations, specifically defining t' = t - 0.12s. By dividing the equations for charges at two different times, q1 and q2, users can derive τ by taking the natural logarithm of the resulting expression. This method provides a clear pathway to solve for τ without resorting to complex exponential equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of RC circuits and their discharge behavior
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and logarithms
  • Basic knowledge of capacitor charge equations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the discharge equation for RC circuits
  • Learn about the implications of time constant (τ) in circuit analysis
  • Explore the use of natural logarithms in solving exponential equations
  • Investigate practical applications of RC circuits in electronics
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in analyzing or designing RC circuits will benefit from this discussion.

greg_rack
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
79
Homework Statement
A charged capacitor of potential ##V=20V## is connected to a resistance ##R=1k\Omega##.
While discharging, at time ##t_{1}=0.12s## the charge is ##q_{1}=40\mu C##, whilst at time ##t_{2}=0.20s## the charge is ##q_{2}=5.4\mu C##. Determine:
-the time constant of the circuit;
-the charge on the capacitor at instant ##t_{0}=0s##;
-the capacity of the capacitor.
Relevant Equations
##q=CV##
Discharge function: ##q(t)=q_{0}e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}##
So, the only thing which came to my mind in order to solve this problem was actually to write down the equations using the discharge function, being given two instants and their corresponding charges... but doing so I'm unable to find anything.
Ideally, I'd say I should find the time constant ##\tau##, then the capacity, and lastly the maximum charge at the beginning of the process.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's actually easier to shift your zero of time to ##t' = t- 0.12s## and then write the discharge equation with initial charge ##q_1##, but to see this more clearly you can start by writing:$$\begin{align*}q_1 &= q_0 e^{-\frac{t_1}{\tau}} \\ q_2 &= q_0 e^{-\frac{t_2}{\tau}}\end{align*}$$What do you get if you divide these two?
 
etotheipi said:
It's actually easier to shift your zero of time to ##t' = t- 0.12s## and then write the discharge equation with initial charge ##q_1##, but to see this more clearly you can start by writing:$$\begin{align*}q_1 &= q_0 e^{-\frac{t_1}{\tau}} \\ q_2 &= q_0 e^{-\frac{t_2}{\tau}}\end{align*}$$What do you get if you divide these two?
What do you mean by "shifting my zero to ##t' = t- 0.12s##"? What's ##t##?
Actually, by equalling the ##q_{0}## from both expressions, I get to solve an exponential equation with just one unknown, which is ##\tau##... but that's a pretty tricky one!
There must be some easier way compared to solving an expo.
 
If you divide those two equations, you get$$q_2 = q_1 \text{exp}({-\frac{t_2 - t_1}{\tau}})$$You can solve that for ##\tau## by taking ##\ln(\cdot)## of both sides.

What I was saying about the shifting your origin of time was that, if you define ##t' = t - t_1##, then the capacitor has charge ##q_1## at ##t' = 0## and ##q_2## at ##t' = t_2 - t_1##. Then, you can just write down the equation above! But this isn't so important, so long as you can get the equation one way or another.
 
etotheipi said:
If you divide those two equations, you get$$q_2 = q_1 \text{exp}({-\frac{t_2 - t_1}{\tau}})$$You can solve that for ##\tau## by taking ##\ln(\cdot)## of both sides.

What I was saying about the shifting your origin of time was that, if you define ##t' = t - t_1##, then the capacitor has charge ##q_1## at ##t' = 0## and ##q_2## at ##t' = t_2 - t_1##. Then, you can just write down the equation above! But this isn't so important, so long as you can get the equation one way or another.
Yeah, that's right! Cool!
I'm feeling quite dumb asking you this question, but: in a system, am I always legitimized to divide the equations to obtain an equivalent one?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
greg_rack said:
Yeah, that's right! Cool!
I'm feeling quite dumb asking you this question, but: in a system, am I always legitimized to divide the equations to obtain an equivalent one?
Yes! - well with the usual stipulation that you're not dividing by zero. Say you have two equations,$$\begin{align*}
a&=b \\
c&=d
\end{align*}$$Divide the first equation by ##c##, with ##c\neq 0##, to get$$\frac{a}{c} = \frac{b}{c}$$
But ##c=d##, so$$\frac{a}{c} = \frac{b}{d}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: greg_rack
etotheipi said:
Yes! - well with the usual stipulation that you're not dividing by zero. Say you have two equations,$$\begin{align*}
a&=b \\
c&=d
\end{align*}$$Divide the first equation by ##c##, with ##c\neq 0##, to get$$\frac{a}{c} = \frac{b}{c}$$
But ##c=d##, so$$\frac{a}{c} = \frac{b}{d}$$
Thank you so much
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K