Time-Dependent Lagrangian Leads to Time Dilation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relativistic Lagrangian for a particle in a scalar potential, represented as ##L = \frac{1}{2} m g_{\mu \nu} \dfrac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \dfrac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} - \Phi##. It establishes that time dilation is influenced not only by velocity but also by the scalar potential, leading to the conclusion that particles in a time-varying potential can experience time dilation even when at rest. The equations indicate that time dilation can be both positive and negative, suggesting that time can run faster for a particle under certain conditions. This phenomenon poses challenges for experimental verification due to the scarcity of manipulable scalar fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic mechanics
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian dynamics
  • Knowledge of scalar potentials in physics
  • Basic concepts of time dilation in relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of scalar fields in quantum field theory
  • Explore the relationship between time dilation and gravitational fields
  • Investigate experimental methods for testing time dilation effects in varying potentials
  • Review literature on the Higgs field and its properties
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and students studying relativistic mechanics and field theory.

stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,954
This is just something unexpected that I noticed recently, and I hadn't heard anyone mention it before.

The relativistic Lagrangian for a particle moving under a scalar potential ##\Phi## is this:

##L = \frac{1}{2} m g_{\mu \nu} \dfrac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \dfrac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} - \Phi##

This leads to the equations of motion:

##m \dfrac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2} = - \partial^\mu \Phi##

So that's just the relativist generalization of Newton's ##F = m A##, with ##F = -\nabla \Phi##. However, a difference is that it's a 4-D equation, rather than a 3-D equation. So let's look at just the 0th component, with ##x^0 = t##:

##m \dfrac{d^2 t}{d\tau^2} = - \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}##

This is truly unexpected (to me). When there is no potential, ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau}## is the time dilation factor ##\gamma##. The above equation seems to be saying that time dilation depends not only on velocity (or spacetime curvature, if you consider General Relativity, which I'm not doing here) but also on the potential. So even a particle at rest will experience time dilation if it is in a time-varying potential.

Another thing that is surprising is that this time dilation can be positive or negative. So if a particle starts out at rest, with ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau} = 1##, then a negative value for ##- \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}## will lead to the particle having ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau} \gt 1##. So time runs faster for the particle, rather than slower.

Is this a real effect? My guess is that it wouldn't be easy to test because there are so few scalar fields (the only one I know of is the Higgs field), and they are not as easily manipulated as the electromagnetic field.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
I have studied this stuff in more detail in
https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1986
and published as a part of a book chapter
https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1992

The scalar potential can be viewed as a dynamical mass squared, which can become negative so that particle can exceed the velocity of light.

But note that your parameter ##\tau##, called ##s## in my work, is not the usual proper time. Hence, the potential does not modify the time dilation. It only modifies the relation between proper time and this parameter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
456
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
935
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K