I Time-Dependent Lagrangian Leads to Time Dilation?

stevendaryl
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
2,954
This is just something unexpected that I noticed recently, and I hadn't heard anyone mention it before.

The relativistic Lagrangian for a particle moving under a scalar potential ##\Phi## is this:

##L = \frac{1}{2} m g_{\mu \nu} \dfrac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} \dfrac{dx^\nu}{d\tau} - \Phi##

This leads to the equations of motion:

##m \dfrac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2} = - \partial^\mu \Phi##

So that's just the relativist generalization of Newton's ##F = m A##, with ##F = -\nabla \Phi##. However, a difference is that it's a 4-D equation, rather than a 3-D equation. So let's look at just the 0th component, with ##x^0 = t##:

##m \dfrac{d^2 t}{d\tau^2} = - \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}##

This is truly unexpected (to me). When there is no potential, ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau}## is the time dilation factor ##\gamma##. The above equation seems to be saying that time dilation depends not only on velocity (or spacetime curvature, if you consider General Relativity, which I'm not doing here) but also on the potential. So even a particle at rest will experience time dilation if it is in a time-varying potential.

Another thing that is surprising is that this time dilation can be positive or negative. So if a particle starts out at rest, with ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau} = 1##, then a negative value for ##- \dfrac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}## will lead to the particle having ##\dfrac{dt}{d\tau} \gt 1##. So time runs faster for the particle, rather than slower.

Is this a real effect? My guess is that it wouldn't be easy to test because there are so few scalar fields (the only one I know of is the Higgs field), and they are not as easily manipulated as the electromagnetic field.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
I have studied this stuff in more detail in
https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.1986
and published as a part of a book chapter
https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1992

The scalar potential can be viewed as a dynamical mass squared, which can become negative so that particle can exceed the velocity of light.

But note that your parameter ##\tau##, called ##s## in my work, is not the usual proper time. Hence, the potential does not modify the time dilation. It only modifies the relation between proper time and this parameter.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top