Time derivative of a time-dependent vector and scalar

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the time derivative of a product involving a time-dependent scalar function, γ(t), and a vector function, u(t), within the context of relativistic mechanics as presented in Griffiths' Electrodynamics. Participants are examining the application of the product rule in this scenario and its implications for deriving expressions related to momentum and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply the product rule to the expression for the time derivative of γ(t)u(t) and are questioning whether the usual product rule holds when differentiating a scalar and a vector. Some are exploring the implications of this differentiation in the context of deriving the work-energy theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing various interpretations and calculations. Some participants assert that the product rule applies, while others express confusion about specific terms and their treatment in the differentiation process. There is a recognition of differing approaches to the problem, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the original problem as stated in Griffiths' text, and there are indications of potential missing information or assumptions regarding the nature of the scalar and vector functions involved. Some participants are also reflecting on the implications of specific assumptions made during their calculations.

cwbullivant
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



## \frac{d}{dt}\gamma(t)\vec{u(t)} ##

Homework Equations



See above

The Attempt at a Solution



This comes from trying to verify a claim in Chapter 12 of Griffiths Electrodynamics, 4th. edition (specifically Eq. 12.62 -> Eq. 12.63, if anyone has it on hand).

I would have expected that the usual product rule applies in this case, and that:

## \frac{d}{dt}\gamma(t)\vec{u(t)} = \frac{d\gamma(t)}{dt}\vec{u(t)} + \gamma(t)\frac{d\vec{u(t)}}{dt} ##

And that all vector operations on the result would proceed as normal (i.e. ## \frac{d}{dt}(\gamma(t)\vec{u(t)}) \cdot \vec{u(t)} = \frac{d\gamma(t)}{dt}\vec{u(t)} \cdot \vec{u(t)} + \gamma(t)\frac{d\vec{u(t)}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u(t)} ##).

But the text of the book appears to imply that:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\gamma(t)\vec{u(t)}) \cdot \vec{u(t)} = \frac{d\gamma(t)}{dt}\frac{d\vec{u(t)}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u(t)} ##

What am I doing wrong here? Does the product rule not apply when one of the quantities to be differentiated is a vector and the other a scalar? That just doesn't sound right.

Edit: The exact chain of equations from the textbook is:## \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{m\vec{u}}{(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} \cdot \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) ##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cwbullivant said:
But the text of the book appears to imply that:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\gamma(t)\vec{u(t)}) \cdot \vec{u(t)} = \frac{d\gamma(t)}{dt}\frac{d\vec{u(t)}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u(t)} ##
It doesn't; work it out carefully and you'll see that that isn't true. The normal product rule of course applies - all Griffiths did was to show the simplified expression.
 
EDIT: poor replay skills

I followed Griffits and I am stuck in the calculation.

The scalar field is not time dependent as actually it is the mass of a test particle, so his original γ becomes \eta \equiv m

In the calculation we want to derive the work-energy theorem thus W = \int \frac{dp}{dt} dl = \int \frac{dp}{dt} . u dt

Of course p is a vector and is define with the proper velocity η

p = m\eta = m\frac{u}{\sqrt{1-u.u/c^2}}

Thus with little work we have to show that

W = \int \frac{dp}{dt} . u dt = \int \frac{dE}{dt} dt

Making the calculation on the left leads me to the following expression, where the right thingy in the brackets is missing in the book:

\frac{ mu }{ (1-u^2/c^2)^{3/2} } . \frac{du}{dt} \left( (1-u^2/c^2)^3 + u^2/c^2 \right)
 
Last edited:
Fightfish said:
It doesn't; work it out carefully and you'll see that that isn't true. The normal product rule of course applies - all Griffiths did was to show the simplified expression.

I get a two term expression when attempting this. Namely:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) = \frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} ##

Take the dot product with u on both terms and it becomes:

## (\frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{mu^3\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} ##

The derivative of relativistic energy, on the other hand, is:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{mc^2}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) = \frac{mu\frac{du}{dt}}{(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} ##

I'm at a loss for how to simplify the two term derivative into that last line.
 
Why not try a specific pair of simple functions and see whether your solution and/or Griffiths' are correct?

Sorry, I see now that you are dealing with specific functions. I missed your edit to the OP.
 
cwbullivant said:
## (\frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{mu^3\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} ##
Pull out the common factor
\frac{m \vec {u} \cdot \frac{d \vec{u}}{dt}}{(1-u^2/c^2)^{3/2}}
 
Fightfish said:
Pull out the common factor
\frac{m \vec {u} \cdot \frac{d \vec{u}}{dt}}{(1-u^2/c^2)^{3/2}}

The fact that the one of the time derivatives is ## \frac{du}{dt} ##, and the other is ## \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} ## doesn't make a difference with regard to pulling them out? I'd think the unit vector in the u direction wouldn't be time independent in general (so ## \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = \frac{du}{dt}\hat{u} + u\frac{d\hat{u}}{dt} ##), so shouldn't that add another product rule expansion?

I see that this does, in fact, get the right answer if you assume that ## \frac{d\hat{u}}{dt} = \vec{0} ##, but is that assertion always valid?
 
You end up with this conundrum because you are not differentiating correctly.
\frac{d}{dt} u^2 = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{u} \cdot \vec{u} \right) = 2 \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d \vec{u}}{dt}
 
cwbullivant said:
(m⃗uududtc2(1−u2c2)3/2+md⃗udt√1−u2c2)⋅⃗u=mu3dudtc2(1−u2c2)3/2+md⃗udt⋅⃗u√1−u2c2 (\frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{mu^3\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}

Be careful of the u^3 as despite not explicitly labelled with a arrow it is a vector, thus always respect the dot and write it. In this case do it as u.u u

cwbullivant said:
The fact that the one of the time derivatives ...

The easiest way to think about it is by writing it by components using Einstein summation convection with upper and lower indexes. Thus: p_i = \left( \frac{d}{dt}\left( \frac{mu}{\sqrt{...}} \right) . u \right)_i = \left( \frac{d}{dt} \frac{mu}{\sqrt{...}} \right)_i u^i = \frac{m}{\sqrt{...}} \frac{du^i}{dt} u_i + m u_i u^i \frac{d}{dt} \frac{1}{\sqrt{...}} = \frac{m}{\sqrt{...}}u.\frac{du}{dt} + \frac{m}{(...)^{3/2}}u.\frac{du}{dt} \frac{u.u}{c^2}

Unfortunately no idea how the get rid of the extra term in brackets, maybe some series...
 
  • #11
You can break this down logically as follows. First, you need to show (by differentiating carefully) that:

##\frac{d\gamma}{dt} = \frac{\gamma^3}{c^2} \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}##

Hence, with ##E = \gamma mc^2## you have:

##\frac{dE}{dt}= \gamma^3 m \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}##

And, with ##\vec{p} = \gamma m \vec{u}## and using the product rule, you have:

##\frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{d\gamma}{dt} mu^2 + \gamma m \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt} = \gamma^3 m (\frac{u^2}{c^2} + \frac{1}{\gamma^2}) \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}##

Finally, as ##\frac{u^2}{c^2} + \frac{1}{\gamma^2} = 1## we have:

##\frac{dE}{dt} = \frac{d\vec{p}}{dt} \cdot \vec{u}##
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Fightfish said:
You end up with this conundrum because you are not differentiating correctly.
\frac{d}{dt} u^2 = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{u} \cdot \vec{u} \right) = 2 \vec{u} \cdot \frac{d \vec{u}}{dt}

I don't see where the ## \frac{d}{dt} u^2 ## term is in the initial expression. The initial one as written is:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = (\frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} ##

And only one of the vectors is inside the time derivative on the left (in your expression, both u vectors are inside the time derivative: ## \frac{d}{dt} \left(\vec{u} \cdot \vec{u} \right) ##; I know that expression is correct, I just don't see how it applies here). Am I supposed to bring the dot and vector on the right inside the time derivative before applying it, so that it looks like this?

## \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}} \cdot \vec{u}) ##
 
  • #13
cwbullivant said:
I don't see where the ## \frac{d}{dt} u^2 ## term is in the initial expression. The initial one as written is:

## \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{m\vec{u}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} = (\frac{m\vec{u}u\frac{du}{dt}}{c^2(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^{3/2}} + \frac{m\frac{d\vec{u}}{dt}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}) \cdot \vec{u} ##
It comes from the derivative of the denominator.
 
  • #14
Fightfish said:
It comes from the derivative of the denominator.

Of course; I should have noticed that sooner, I was a bit too fixated on the parentheses there. Thanks for the assistance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K