Time dilation and the photon clock

In summary, the example of the two clocks with different mechanisms (light beams and tennis balls) moving at constant speeds shows the effects of time dilation in relativity. The moving clock with a constant speed tennis ball will still tick slower than the stationary one, demonstrating that all moving clocks will be observed to slow down by the same factor. This is because in relativity, all motion is relative and there is no absolute way to distinguish between a stationary and a moving observer. This experiment disproves the idea that the mechanism of the clock is the only factor affecting its accuracy when in motion.
  • #71
Does the photon actually travel at light speed? When your on a flatbed truck traveling down the highway at 70mph with a photon clock in hand, does the photon for you on the truck still travel at the speed of light and count your seconds accurately? To an observer on the ground does the photon look as if it's going slower? Has this ever been tested and proven?

Please answer my questions shortly and staying on track completely with what I'm asking; do not diverge from my question into other explanations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #72
NtroPunDfeetd said:
Does the photon actually travel at light speed?
Yes. According to everyone.
When your on a flatbed truck traveling down the highway at 70mph with a photon clock in hand, does the photon for you on the truck still travel at the speed of light and count your seconds accurately?
Sure.
To an observer on the ground does the photon look as if it's going slower?
No. The photon travels at light speed. The clock ticks slower, since for the ground observer the photon travels a greater distance.
Has this ever been tested and proven?
No one has ever done experiments with photon clocks, but the effect it illustrates--time dilation--has been tested.
 
  • #73
Doc Al is Offline:
Posts: 23,346
Blog Entries: 1 Re: Time dilation and the photon clock

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by NtroPunDfeetd
Does the photon actually travel at light speed?

Yes. According to everyone.
.

To an observer on the ground does the photon look as if it's going slower?

No. The photon travels at light speed. The clock ticks slower, since for the ground observer the photon travels a greater distance.

What is the interpretation in the case of a photon clock at a location of low gravitational potential?
Is it traveling slower or traveling a greater distance due to the geometry at a small Scwarzschild radius?
Thanks
 
  • #74
Austin0 said:
What is the interpretation in the case of a photon clock at a location of low gravitational potential?
Is it traveling slower or traveling a greater distance due to the geometry at a small Scwarzschild radius?
Thanks

To keep it simple take the case of a short horizontal light clock. (Horizontal rulers are not length contracted by gravity.) To an observer higher up, the clock lower down is running slow and the speed of light lower down is slower than the speed of light higher up. These two effects conspire in such a way, that to a local observer co-located with the light clock at a small Schwarzschild radius, the speed of light appears normal. This slowing down of clocks and light, deep in a gravitational well is not an optical illusion, because by lowering a clock down and bringing it back up again, it can be demonstrated that the lowered clock really does run slower than a clock that remained higher up.

It follows that if the clock lower down is really running slower than the clock higher up, then the speed of light lower down must really be slower than the speed of light higher up, in order for a local observer lower down to measure the local speed of light as c.
 
Last edited:
  • #75
kev said:
To keep it simple take the case of a short horizontal light clock. (Horizontal rulers are not length contracted by gravity.) To an observer higher up, the clock lower down is running slow and the speed of light lower down is slower than the speed of light higher up. These two effects conspire in such a way, that to a local observer co-located with the light clock at a small Schwarzschild radius, the speed of light appears normal. This slowing down of clocks and light, deep in a gravitational well is not an optical illusion, because by lowering a clock down and bringing it back up again, it can be demonstrated that the lowered clock really does run slower than a clock that remained higher up.

It follows that if the clock lower down is really running slower than the clock higher up, then the speed of light lower down must really be slower than the speed of light higher up, in order for a local observer lower down to measure the local speed of light as c.

Thanks for your very clear explanation. It was pretty much what my own logic arrived at but I no longer have the implicit faith in "logic" I once had.
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
664
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
88
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
253
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
669
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
Back
Top