Time & Mass: Newbie Questions from a Spaceship Observer

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fyreth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Sr Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relativistic effects of time dilation and mass increase as experienced by observers in different inertial frames, specifically involving a spaceship moving at high velocity. Participants explain that both observers perceive the other's time as slower due to the relativity of simultaneity, which complicates direct comparisons of time measurements. The conversation highlights that neither observer can definitively claim superiority in their perception of time, as both are correct within their respective frames. This paradox is rooted in the fundamental principles of Einstein's theory of relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with time dilation concepts
  • Knowledge of inertial frames of reference
  • Basic grasp of simultaneity in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of time dilation in high-speed travel
  • Explore the concept of simultaneity in different inertial frames
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of Lorentz transformations
  • Investigate real-world applications of relativity in GPS technology
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of relativistic physics and the nature of time and mass in high-velocity scenarios.

Fyreth
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around some of the basic concepts.

Imagine a spaceship moving at a certain velocity relative to you. To you, his time is slower than yours. He guy in the spaceship doesn't know his time is slowed down.
If his time is slower than yours, it means that he thinks your time is faster than normal.

But if we turn it around the guy in the spaceship can say that you're moving at a certain velocity and therefore your time is slower than his and that you think his time is faster than normal.

So what's going on? Who seems slower to who?

And another thing. If mass increases with velocity and you're in a spaceship. Wouldn't you notice the increase of inertia?
Or, more likely, if mass is normal to you and your mass seems increased to the observer outside on top of the slowed down time. Would he think you're stumbling around weirdly while everything is alright to you?

Such a fun theory. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fyreth said:
If his time is slower than yours, it means that he thinks your time is faster than normal.

No, each of you seems slow to the other.

I found this the hardest part of relativity to get when I first learned it.

The key here is that neither of you has any direct method of checking what you think about the other. Every method of checking what's going on involves the exchange of signals, which take time to propagate. A says B is slow, but B says A only thinks B is slow because of effects arising from the propagation of the signals back and forth.
 
Fyreth said:
I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around some of the basic concepts.

Imagine a spaceship moving at a certain velocity relative to you. To you, his time is slower than yours. He guy in the spaceship doesn't know his time is slowed down.
If his time is slower than yours, it means that he thinks your time is faster than normal.

But if we turn it around the guy in the spaceship can say that you're moving at a certain velocity and therefore your time is slower than his and that you think his time is faster than normal.

So what's going on? Who seems slower to who?

Imagine that the spaceship is very, very, long, and that a whole team of observers is deployed along its length. Also imagine that you are not the only observer in your frame of reference who is observing the spaceship; there is a whole team of observers strung out along the direction of the spaceship movement. Now, your entire team focuses its attention on just one guy on the spaceship, and each of you records the time displayed on your clocks and the time displayed on his clock when he passes each of you. So there's one guy in the spaceship frame of reference that is being tracked by multiple guys in your frame of reference that he is sweeping past. After the measurements are made, the guys in your frame of reference get together and compare the data obtained. You then plot a graph of the times on the guy's clock on the vertical axis, and the times on your clocks as the horizontal axis. The slope of this line will be less than 1, suggesting to your team (as well as to the guy on the train) that his clock is running slower than yours.

Now let's flip the experiment. The team of observers on the spaceship focuses its attention on just one guy in your frame of reference ( you), and each of them records the time displayed on their clocks and the time displayed on your clock as they each sweep past you.
So there's one guy in your frame of reference (namely you), that is being tracked by multiple guys in the spaceship frame of reference. After the measurements are made, the guys in the spaceship frame of reference get together and compare the data obtained. They then plot a graph of the times on your clock on the vertical axis, and the times of their clocks as the horizontal axis. The slope of this line will be less than 1, suggesting to the spaceship team (as well as to yourself) that your clock is running slower than theirs.

Which team is right? Within the framework of the way these experiments are carried out (compare the italicized wording), both teams are right. How can this be? Your team of observers receives snapshots of reality at constant values of the time t displayed on your synchronized set of clocks, while the team of observers on the spaceship receive snapshots of reality at constant values of the time t' displayed on their synchronized set of clocks. Unfortunately, constant values of t at different locations in your frame of reference are accompanied by non-constant values of t' in the spaceship frame of reference at these same locations, and vice versa. This is all related to the non-uniqueness of simultaneity between inertial frames of reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
940
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K