Time: Travelling Twins vs Black Hole Gravity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bryan S.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of time dilation in the context of black holes and the traveling twins paradox. Participants explore the effects of gravity on time as experienced near a black hole compared to other scenarios, including the traveling twins thought experiment. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and the nuances of spacetime behavior in different gravitational contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how time behaves near a black hole compared to the traveling twins scenario, questioning why clocks behave differently in these contexts.
  • Another participant clarifies that all clocks tick at the same local rate, but different paths through spacetime can result in varying amounts of elapsed time, a concept derived from Special Relativity.
  • There is an acknowledgment that the twins scenario typically ignores gravitational effects, focusing instead on the relative speeds of the twins.
  • Participants discuss the importance of distinguishing between the effects of gravity and velocity in the traveling twins scenario, suggesting that a more precise formulation would involve the "stay at home" twin being in a gravity-free environment.
  • One participant shares their personal experience of grappling with similar concepts in quantum mechanics and cosmology, indicating that confusion is common in these discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the principles of time dilation and the distinction between gravitational and velocity effects. However, there remains some uncertainty and confusion regarding the implications of these principles in specific scenarios, particularly concerning the black hole and the traveling twins paradox.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about gravity in the traveling twins scenario and the specific conditions near a black hole. The conversation does not resolve these complexities.

Bryan S.
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Forgive me if I have posted this in the wrong location. I'm trying to reconcile my understanding of spacetime, but am running into a paradox that I'm sure is arising from my own misunderstandings. As you get closer to a black hole, time, with respect to outside observers, begins to slow to a stop. My understanding is that it is the extreme gravity that is warping space and time around the black hole, to the point that, as an example, a clock just outside the black hole would move slower than one sitting outside of it's influence. Now the second issue I am having is with the traveling twins idea. Unless I'm misunderstanding, the twin that remains on the planet, will experience time at a faster rate with respect to the traveling twin. So what causes the clock just outside the black hole to move slower, the clock on Earth to move faster, and a clock in space to move at what I will consider "normal" pace?

Edit: Updated references to focus on just outside the black hole.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
All clocks move at the same local rate of one second per second. The confusing part is that while that is true, it is ALSO true that different paths through space-time can take differing AMOUNTS of time even though along both paths, the clocks are ticking at the same rate. This is a bit hard to get your head around at first but it falls out rather trivially from the simple math of Special Relativity and has been show experimentally to be true.

By the way, "inside" a black hole, things get exceeding weird. What you really mean in your question is "just outside the black hole", not "within it"

EDIT: Google "muons and special relativity" for a concrete example (and be careful ... you'll see a lot of lunatic sites saying relativity is wrong)
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the quick response, I updated the post to reflect just outside the black hole rather than within. I'm just trying to wrap my head around this concept which has me rather confused at the moment. Thanks!
 
Bryan S. said:
Thank you for the quick response, I updated the post to reflect just outside the black hole rather than within. I'm just trying to wrap my head around this concept which has me rather confused at the moment. Thanks!
Hey, you're not alone. When I first started studying quantum mechanics (the very small) and cosmology (the very large), there were several times when I stomped around the room tearing at my hair and shouting "THAT CAN'T BE RIGHT !" :smile:
 
Bryan S. said:
So what causes the clock just outside the black hole to move slower, the clock on Earth to move faster, and a clock in space to move at what I will consider "normal" pace?
Although the twins scenario is often posed as one twin staying on earth, the scenario is usually supposed to ignore gravity. So the only difference between the two twins is speed, not gravity.
 
Bryan S. said:
Unless I'm misunderstanding, the twin that remains on the planet, will experience time at a faster rate with respect to the traveling twin.

As DaleSpam pointed out, this isn't because the traveling twin is "out in space". It's because he's traveling; more precisely, because he travels out and then turns around and comes back again. To make it clear that gravity is being ignored in the scenario, a truly precise presentation would have the "stay at home" twin floating out in space somewhere, while the traveling twin fires his rockets to start up, then to turn around, and to stop again when he returns.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
9K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K