Timing a pendulum drawn back to the horizontal.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Grozny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Horizontal Pendulum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the timing of a pendulum drawn back to the horizontal position, specifically examining the validity of formulas for the period of both simple and compound pendulums at various angles. Participants explore the implications of using these formulas beyond the small-angle approximation, focusing on the fall of the pendulum from horizontal to vertical.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the formula for the period of a pendulum applies when drawn back to the horizontal, noting the need for precision in timing.
  • Another participant provides a link to a Wikipedia article that discusses both small-angle and arbitrary angle cases for simple pendulums, but notes that the compound pendulum case is only addressed under the small-angle approximation.
  • A participant presents the formula for the period of a simple pendulum and a compound pendulum under the small-angle approximation, suggesting a method to find the length of a simple pendulum that matches the period of a compound pendulum.
  • There is a repeated inquiry about whether the equivalence of periods for small angles holds for large angles, with one participant asserting that it does.
  • Another participant evaluates a definite integral related to the period of the pendulum and requests more accurate calculations from others with access to computational tools.
  • There is a suggestion that the period for the compound pendulum can be expressed similarly to the simple pendulum, with a formula involving an integral, but this is met with uncertainty regarding its correctness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the applicability of the formulas for large angles, with some asserting that the periods are equivalent while others seek clarification. The discussion remains unresolved on the exact formula for the compound pendulum's period when drawn back to the horizontal.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the existing formulas, particularly the lack of a comprehensive formula for compound pendulums at large angles. There is also a dependence on the definitions used for inertia and other variables.

Grozny
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Does this formula for the period of a pendulum work if the pendulum is drawn all the way back to the horizontal? Or does it only work when the angle off the vertical is small enough that its sine is approximately the angle itself? Note that my pendulum is stiff (a beam, not a weighted wire) so there is no difficulty in holding it out straight.

Period of a pendulum: [tex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{I}{mgh}}[/tex]
I: inertia
m: mass
g: accelleration due to gravity, 9.80665
h: distance from the pivot to the center of gravity

I am actually only interested in the fall of the pendulum, from horizontal to vertical. I have figured out I, m, g and h for my device (it uses ball bearings, so friction can probably be ignored) and calculated the time to fall by quartering the period. The answer is close to my observations, but I need it exact, to within +/- about ten microseconds.

Can someone tell me if I am doing this right? If not, then what is the formula for the fall of a pendulum from the horizontal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jeff Reid said:

For a simple pendulum, Wiki considers both the small-angle approximation and the more general case of an arbitrary angle. For the latter, they give this formula for the period:

[tex]T = \frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\int_{0}^{\theta_0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos{\theta} - \cos{\theta_0}}}<br /> d\theta[/tex]

Note: I am using the notation L = length and h = distance from the pivot to the center of gravity, which is different than Wiki.

However, for a compound pendulum, which is what I am concerned with, Wiki only considers the small-angle approximation and gives the same formula that I posted in the OP.

So my question stands.

I need a formula like the one above, but for a compound pendulum.
 
Simple pendulum, small angle: [tex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}[/tex]

Compound pendulum, small angle: [tex]T = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{I}{mgh}}[/tex]

Since I have the formula for both simple and compound pendulums given the small-angle approximation, I can set them equal to each other to find the length, L, of a simple pendulum with the same period as the compound pendulum that I am interested in.

If this equivalence held for large angles as well, I would not need a formula for compound pendulums but could just plug L into this formula:

[tex]T = \frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}}\int_{0}^{\theta_0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos{\theta} - \cos{\theta_0}}}<br /> d\theta[/tex]

So, my question is, if a simple pendulum has the same period as a compound pendulum for small angles, does it also have the same period for large angles?
 
Grozny said:
If a simple pendulum has the same period as a compound pendulum for small angles, does it also have the same period for large angles?

Anybody?

Also, I evaluated this definite integral to (what I think is) five digits:

[tex]2.6221 = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos{\theta}}}<br /> d\theta[/tex]

If someone has access to Mathematica or some similar software, could you do this more accurately for me, please?
 
Grozny said:
So, my question is, if a simple pendulum has the same period as a compound pendulum for small angles, does it also have the same period for large angles?
Yes. Both a simple pendulum and a physical pendulum have similar equations:

(1) α = - (g/L) sinθ (for a simple pendulum)
(2) α = - (mgh/I) sinθ (for a physical pendulum)

The only difference is the constant in front of the sinθ term. So just replace one constant with the other and you should be OK.
 
So the period for the compound pendulum is this?

[tex]T = \frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{I}{mgh}}\int_{0}^{\theta_0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos{\theta} - \cos{\theta_0}}}<br /> d\theta[/tex]
 
Grozny said:
So the period for the compound pendulum is this?

[tex]T = \frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}\sqrt{\frac{I}{mgh}}\int_{0}^{\theta_0}\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos{\theta} - \cos{\theta_0}}}<br /> d\theta[/tex]
Assuming the wiki equation for the simple pendulum is correct (I didn't check), then yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
7K