Tiny Tim Sighting Today: Fans Hopeful for Return

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Tiny Tim was last seen at 5:22 PM today, sparking hope among fans for his return to the forum. He has been inactive for five weeks, leaving many threads unanswered and users feeling neglected. Fans express their concern and miss his unique contributions and engaging replies. Several members have reached out to him via private messages but have yet to receive a response. The community remains hopeful for Tiny Tim's return to revive the forum's activity.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83
Tiny tim was last seen today at 5:22 pm.I am a huge fan of tiny-tim.I really hope that he will start posting and helping others with his incredible skills.
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena
Physics news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
I sent him a PM
Did he reply?What his reply was?
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena
gracy said:
Tiny tim was last seen today at 5:22 pm.I am a huge fan of tiny-tim.I really hope that he will start posting and helping others with his incredible skills.
Tiny Tim has not logged in for 5 weeks now. :eek: Whole skeins of threads are going unanswered ... :frown:

The forum's smileys are gathering dust from disuse ... :oldcry:

gracy is missing his patient zany replies :oldfrown: ...

... everyone is worried. :nb)

Where in the world is the forum's @tiny-tim :angel:
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena

Thread 'Thank you to mentors, advisors and members'

I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
View full post »

Thread 'Site Usability nitpick -- Hyperlinks should be underlined'

This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
View full post »

Thread 'Thank you physics forums, 20 years later'

About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
View full post »

Similar threads

I One Way Twin Revisited: Understanding Tim & Tom's Watches on Home & Northbound
Replies
37
Views
3K
Where have all the science helpers gone?
Replies
20
Views
3K
Physics Switching PhD schools: is it possible?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Courses Need help in choosing math classes for a HS student
Replies
32
Views
2K
Other Am I too old to become a Prof?
Replies
18
Views
2K
I Could Tim Maudlin's Views on Bell and QM Be Flawed?
Replies
37
Views
5K
HVAC Efficiency of a homemade Air Conditioning unit
Replies
13
Views
7K
Can Returning to Academia Reignite a Former Consultant's Passion for Science?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Optimizing Air Flow for CO2 and Heat Loss in Vans
Replies
7
Views
3K
Hello, introducting myself!
Replies
2
Views
867

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top