To find the length of a pendulum in Simple Harmonic motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the lengths of two simple pendulums oscillating in simple harmonic motion (SHM). The original poster presents a scenario where one pendulum is longer than the other, and they are in sync after 20 seconds, with the longer pendulum completing 10 oscillations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the periods of the two pendulums and question the assumptions regarding their oscillation counts. The original poster attempts to apply the formula for periodic time to find the lengths, while others clarify the implications of the oscillation counts.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the relationship between the periods of the pendulums. There is a focus on understanding why the shorter pendulum must have completed a specific number of cycles and how that relates to its length. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations needed to find the shorter pendulum's length.

Contextual Notes

There is a note of confusion regarding whether the question is homework-related, but it has been clarified that it is not. Participants are also discussing the implications of the pendulums being "in step" and the conditions under which this occurs.

Yehia11
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
If we have 2 simple pendulums, (one longer than the other) oscillating in SHM in step. The next time they are in step is after 20 seconds has elapsed, during which the time the longer pendulum has completed exactly 10 oscillations. Find the string lengths

I found that the length of the long one is 1 metre through the equation:

Periodic Time (which is 2) = 2pi X root(l/g)

but how do we find the length of the longer one??

thankyou in advance. help very appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this homework? If so it should be in the homework section.

Torquil
 
torquil said:
Is this homework? If so it should be in the homework section.

Torquil

It is not homework, so no, it should not be in the homework section.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, but I think it is good to ask whenever there is a problem that looks "homework-like". Don't take it personally.

Anyway, the shorter (and faster) pendulum must have completed exactly 11 periods when they are in step for the first time, since the longer one has completed exactly 10.

Thus the pendulum periods satisfy T_long * 10 = T_short * 11.

This gives you T_short which is slightly smaller than T_long, and you can use your formula to calculate its length.

Torquil
 
Yehia11 said:
but how do we find the length of the longer one??

Just to clarify, you meant to say "shorter one" here, right? Because you have already found the length of the longer one to be approximately 1m. Anyway, if my calculation mixes this up, just modify my numbers a bit (the 10 and 11 in my formula) to fit with the exact problem. The idea is the same.

Torquil
 
No problem, sorry if i sounded antagonistic, no harm in asking.

Anyway, firstly YES your right I did mean the SHORTER one, sorry my bad. We know the length of the longer one, it is the shorter one we are trying to find. :)

And secondly why must the shorter one have completed exactly 11 cycles? we know that the long one (and slower one) completed 10, but i feel we have too little info about the short one? or am i wrong? thank you very much for your input, i appreciate it.
 
First, the shorter one must have completed an exact whole number of periods, since the two pendulums meet when the longer one has completed an exact whole number of periods.

In addition, if the shorter one has completed more than one extra period (ie. a total of 12 of more), then they would have been in step much earlier, since it would have had to overtake the longer one at least once before t=20s. So then it would not be true that it was the first time they were in step. Therefore the shorter one must have completed exactly one more period than the longer one.

E.g. if the shorter one had completed 12 in that time, they would have been in step after 10s also, which is not true according to the problem statement. If the shorter one had completed 13, they would have been in step after exactly 20/3 seconds, and so on.

I'm assuming that "in step" means being at the same position with a velocity in the same direction.

Torquil
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K