Today I Learned

[Hornbein]

TIL that honeybees can be weaponized. What next, bunny rabbits?

 

[jack action]

Remember, 3 weeks ago, when I learned that Neil Armstrong went through customs after returning from the moon?

TIL even a weirder fact:

And it is true:

France issued Ramesses II a passport​

It's true that the mummy of Ramesses II was issued a passport in 1974.

Ramesses II lived to be 96 and was the third pharaoh of the 19th Dynasty, according to Ancient History Encyclopedia.

When the mummy of Ramesses had to be flown to Paris for restoration, it was issued an authentic Egyptian passport that included a photo of his ancient face. His occupation was listed as "King (deceased)," National Geographic reported.

His body was entombed in the Valley of the Kings, but it was later moved by ancient Egyptian priests because of rampant looters, according to National Geographic.

Archaeologists noticed the mummy's deteriorating condition and treated it for a fungal infection in Paris.

The French military aircraft that brought Ramesses' remains from the Cairo museum was greeted by the Garde Republicaine, France's equivalent of a U.S. Marine honor guard, according to a 1976 article from The New York Times.

However, the image is an artist's creation of the passport and the pharaoh's passport is not publicly available.

 

[BWV]

Some handy Australian lingo, thanks to the US Embassy

 

[fresh_42]

Remember, 3 weeks ago, when I learned that Neil Armstrong went through customs after returning from the moon?

TIL even a weirder fact:

View attachment 332747​

And it is trueowever, the image is an artist's creation of the passport and the pharaoh's passport is not publicly available.

McCoy: The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe. [ST-IV, The Voyage Home]

 

[Hornbein]

In 2017 Congresswomen got the right to bare arms. The Senate followed suit two years later.

This week the Senate passed the SHow Our Respect To the Senate (SHORTS) act, which requires "business attire." LIke that sense of humor.

 

[Swamp Thing]

TIL that honeybees can be weaponized. What next, bunny rabbits?

This man was trained to stick his tongue out whenever he had a good idea.

Anyway, you can geek out on bee olfaction here https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574523000159 if you want.

 

[Swamp Thing]

TIL that workers in Alfred Nobel's nitroglycerine factory had to sit on one-legged stools so that they wouldn't be able to fall asleep on the job and thus cause an accident.

 

[Haborix]

TIL that workers in Alfred Nobel's nitroglycerine factory had to sit on one-legged stools so that they wouldn't be able to fall asleep on the job and thus cause an accident.

Hmm, I wonder about the accidents from sitting on a one-legged stool...

 

[Swamp Thing]

TIL that honeybees can be weaponized. What next, bunny rabbits?

Is this a reasonably plausible roadmap to develop an explosives / drugs / gas leak detector:

Identify the receptor molecules that are involved when bees smell the target substance. Modify some bacteria so they produce those molecules. Find a way to get an electronic signal when the receptor molecules catch their target molecules.

Ref: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574523000159

Another possibility: based on recent progress in growing artificial tissue... Can we grow bee tissue (from stem cells or whatever) of the right type, then interface with it via microelectrodes?

 

[kyphysics]

. . .you may not be getting the fish you order at a restaurant. Apparently, many restaurants think consumers are too dumb to know the difference between x-fish (more expensive) and y-fish (cheaper) and will substitute y for x.

*shakes head*

Trickery is everywhere. A family friend, I found out, cheated my parents when he & his crew built a fence for them. He charged them for cedar (which they requested, as it's a better wood), but used pine instead (substantiated by multiple knowledgeable sources). Took their money for a garage construction job also and only completed 75-80% of it and said would return to do the rest (never did and said he was too busy and told them to finish it themselves).

Cheaper substitutions. . .be wary.

 

[Hornbein]

Is this a reasonably plausible roadmap to develop an explosives / drugs / gas leak detector:

Identify the receptor molecules that are involved when bees smell the target substance. Modify some bacteria so they produce those molecules. Find a way to get an electronic signal when the receptor molecules catch their target molecules.

Ref: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214574523000159

Another possibility: based on recent progress in growing artificial tissue... Can we grow bee tissue (from stem cells or whatever) of the right type, then interface with it via microelectrodes?

Last time I looked (ten years ago?) the basics of the sense of smell were not understood. We don't know how it works.
.

 

[DaveC426913]

. . .you may not be getting the fish you order at a restaurant. Apparently, many restaurants think consumers are too dumb to know the difference between x-fish (more expensive) and y-fish (cheaper) and will substitute y for x.

*shakes head*

Trickery is everywhere. A family friend, I found out, cheated my parents when he & his crew built a fence for them. He charged them for cedar (which they requested, as it's a better wood), but used pine instead (substantiated by multiple knowledgeable sources). Took their money for a garage construction job also and only completed 75-80% of it and said would return to do the rest (never did and said he was too busy and told them to finish it themselves).

Cheaper substitutions. . .be wary.

This is so true! I once had a contract for a deck built of cedar, but when they finished it I found out they'd used pollock.

 

[kyphysics]

This is so true! I once had a contract for a deck built of cedar, but when they finished it I found out they'd used pollock.

Cheaters are everywhere. Sometimes, it's just very tough and/or exhausting to try to keep up with scams. Who has time (and/or knowledge) to look into all these fake/scam-ey/cheating situations?

Here is another construction/carpenter one. You agree to buy some materials:

dry wall
a crown molding
a pillar/post

The contractor buys it and gives you the receipt (Home Depot, Lowe's, etc.). Then, when he/she installs the actual item, they use a a different, cheaper one. SECRET: they bought these separately and have a separate receipt for them. They charged you for the expensive ones (which they bought also, but will not use), but then actually gave you a cheaper item. Afterwards, they return the more expensive items and pocket the difference.

The "trick" to this one is you think you got the real goods, b/c of the legitimate receipt for them.

Unless you demand the receipt and boxing for items AND have an EYE to spot differences, you could get taken.

Speaking of pollock, apparently scallops are one of the most faked items and one way is to use pollock fish instead:


Inside Edition's fake food series has me super angry and paranoid now. So many cheats out there!

 

[skynr13]

Yeah, but I've tried adjusting my personal aspect ratio and I'm STILL fat !

And that goes for sitting at the computer all day!

 

[skynr13]

Today I learned that "chasing the dragon" is slang for smoking heroin.

Jim Morrison speaks of 'Riding the Snake!'

 

[Janus]

TIL about "skiplagging". Apparently, it can sometimes be cheaper to by a ticket from Airport A to Airport C with a layover at airport B than it is to by a ticket for a direct flight to Airport B. So people wanting to go from A to B will by the layover ticket, and never take the second leg of the trip to C. Of course, the Airlines don't like it, as it leaves them with an empty seat from B to C that they otherwise could of sold.

 

[phinds]

I don't know about these days but it used to be true that some flights were cheaper for a round trip than for one way so folks who wanted a one-way ticket would buy a round trip and not use the return flight. Airline prices often don't make any sense.

 

[DaveC426913]

Of course, the Airlines don't like it, as it leaves them with an empty seat from B to C that they otherwise could of sold.

I don't know about these days but it used to be true that some flights were cheaper for a round trip than for one way so folks who wanted a one-way ticket would buy a round trip and not use the return flight. Airline prices often don't make any sense.

This is an indication of their profit margins.

If they charge, say, $1000 for a layover from A to C,
But they charge, say, $1200 for the direct flight,
That means the full flight from A to C (including all additional costs of the layover, let's say $200) costs less than $800.
Which means the cost of a direct flight is less than $800.
And that $400+ is straight additional profit.

 

[pinball1970]

TIL Something about a series. I am now very depressed about it.

 

[jack action]

Of course, the Airlines don't like it, as it leaves them with an empty seat from B to C that they otherwise could of sold.

But wasn't it already sold in the first place? If people buy tickets for a flight and 90% of the passengers don't show up, why would the company care if there are only 10% of the seats filled? It just means less fuel needed thus a bigger profit.

 

[gmax137]

This skiplagging has been in the news recently. The reports said that

• it is specifically prohibited by the "contract" you (apparently) agree to when you buy your ticket
• the airlines can ban you from future flights and confiscate your freq flyer miles

Why would they be so upset? I think mainly because it exposes the nonsensical pricing, where A to B ticket is more $$ than A to B to C. Imagine if bus fares worked this way. "Wait, you have to pay more to get off at this stop!"

 

[pinball1970]

TIL Nobel for physics 2023 is announced tomo

 

[berkeman]

TIL Nobel for physics 2023 is announced tomo

Europe is back on Standard Time already?

 

[Borg]

I don't know about these days but it used to be true that some flights were cheaper for a round trip than for one way so folks who wanted a one-way ticket would buy a round trip and not use the return flight. Airline prices often don't make any sense.

I don't think that this happens as much anymore but I have used it in the past. My wife was overseas once and needed to come home. She couldn't understand why I bought her a round-trip ticket. It took a bit of explaining to assure her that I did not buy a more expensive ticket and that yes, the round trip version was cheaper.

 

[Hornbein]

Suppose your itinerary is A to B to C to D. Often the ticket from A to D is less than B to C.

 

[phinds]

Suppose your itinerary is A to B to C to D. Often the ticket from A to D is less than B to C.

As I said

Airline prices often don't make any sense.

 

[Ibix]

it is specifically prohibited by the "contract" you (apparently) agree to when you buy your ticket

I really struggle to imagine a contract term saying "you paid for services A and B, and if you only use A we can punish you" being enforceable. Doesn't mean they don't write such a term, of course, and challenging one might be more risky than it's worth.

Why would they be so upset?

I think they may have to request fuel volumes before they know people haven't turned up. So they end up carrying more fuel than they need, which is more delay during refueling and more weight in flight (and therefore fuel use) than they need. If no-showing is particularly rampant they may have more flights than they need, and/or more staff on duty.

It all stems from their bizarre pricing structure, of course, but large scale no-shows probably do cost them money.

 

[Borg]

Airlines do account for this by overbooking flights and selling more seats than the plane holds. Usually it works pretty well for them but sometimes they have to explain it to irate passengers who expected that they had a confirmed seat assignment and are suddenly being bumped from the plane.

 

[DaveC426913]

I really struggle to imagine a contract term saying "you paid for services A and B, and if you only use A we can punish you" being enforceable.

Yeah, go check out my thread on phones and services.
You want a 2-year contract? Here's an almost free phone.
Oh, you just want the phone? That's $1000.

 

[jack action]

So they end up carrying more fuel than they need, which is more delay during refueling and more weight in flight (and therefore fuel use) than they need. If no-showing is particularly rampant they may have more flights than they need, and/or more staff on duty.

But I already paid for that fuel and that staff. The plane is still lighter by my weight - and my baggage - missing and the staff can give a better service to the other passengers.

Imagine you buy tickets for an entire airplane and don't show up. The entire staff is there and the fuel tanks are full. The plane is empty and leaves anyway ... because they were paid to do so. Not only they won't lose money (the ticket buyers do) but they will use less fuel overall, have no meals to serve, etc. so a slightly larger profit overall. Sure, they could have made more if they had not hired the staff and filled up the tanks, but they cannot lose any if they priced their fare right from the beginning.