Topology - Gluing two handlebodies by the identity

  • Thread starter Thread starter barbutzo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Topology
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in Algebraic Topology concerning the fundamental group of a space formed by gluing two handlebodies of equal genus in S^3 using the identity mapping. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the application of the Seifert-Van-Kampen theorem in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the Seifert-Van-Kampen theorem to determine the fundamental group of the resulting space after gluing the handlebodies. They question their reasoning when they arrive at a conclusion that seems incorrect. Other participants inquire about the definition of the identity mapping in this context, suggesting a need for clarification on the gluing process.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the identity mapping and its effect on the fundamental group. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the identity mapping, but no consensus has been reached on the original poster's confusion regarding the application of the Seifert-Van-Kampen theorem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the assumptions related to the identity mapping and its implications for the boundaries of the handlebodies. There is also a mention of the potential for misunderstanding the nature of the gluing process.

barbutzo
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a question I'm having a hard time with in an introductory Algebraic Topology course:
Take two handlebodies of equal genus g in S^3 and identify their boundaries by the identity mapping. What is the fundamental group of the resulting space M?

Now, I know you can glue two handlebodies of equal genus to create S^3 itself - but that's gluing is not done by the identity mapping.
Intuitively, it would seem I would get the free group with g generators - it's as if I'm identifying the generators of the fundamental groups of both handlebodies. Thing is, when I'm trying to formalize that notion using the Seifert-Van-Kampen theorem - it doesn't turn out right. If I'm trying to use SVK then after identifying the boundaries, the two handlebodies cover the space, and their intersection is a connected sum of tori. The induced homomorphism from their intersection to each of the handlebodies maps all elements of the intersections fundamental group to e, as they are all equivalent to a point once you can move the loops through the solid handlebody. Now, since the fundamental group of each of the handlebodies is the free group with g generators, it follows from SVK that the fundamental group of M would be the free group with 2g generators (just the free product of both of their fundamental groups, seeing as the intersection didn't create any relations), which, to me, seems twice as much as is correct :)

Any ideas where I'm going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is meant here by the identity mapping? I would think that the identity mapping would map a point to itself but that would only be a "gluing" if the two handelbodies shared a common boundary.
 
The meaning of identity here can be seen this way - suppose we start with one handlebody, and duplicate it to create the second one. Now the identity means mapping each point in the original to the point it was duplicated to in the second.
 
OK, I think I've worked out my problem. Is it considered acceptable here to post my final solution to my question?
 
Sure, go ahead. I'd be interested in seeing it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
13K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K