Torque and angular momentum of a swing

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a gymnast performing a giant swing on a high bar, focusing on the angular speed required at the bottom of the swing to complete the motion. The scenario assumes a simplified model where the gymnast's body is straight and no work is done during the swing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss whether to apply conservation of energy or other methods to solve the problem. One participant attempts to relate net force to angular velocity, while another explores the relationship between rotational kinetic energy and potential energy.

Discussion Status

Some participants have proposed equations relating to rotational kinetic energy and potential energy, while others express uncertainty about the definitions of variables such as height and length. There is an ongoing exploration of the problem without a clear consensus on the approach or values to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the clarity of the problem statement and the definitions of parameters like height (h) and length (L) in the context of the gymnast's swing.

dimpledur
Messages
193
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A gymnas is performing a giant swing on the high bar. IN a simplified model of the giant swing, assume that the gymnast keeps his arms and body straight. Also assume that the gymnast does no work. With what angular speed should he be moving at, at the bottom of the swing, to ensure that he can make it all the way around? The distance from the bar to his feet is 2m and his centre of gravity is 1m in.



The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure if I am supposed to apply conservation of energy for this question, or if there is a simpler way?

I was going to say:

Fnet=mv^2/r
Fnet*r/m = v^2
sqrt (Fnet*r/m) = v

and then convert v into angular velocity.

However, I don't know how to solve for Fnet etc.

I'm not sure how to approach this problem at all. Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I may have figured it out. Correct me if I am wrong, please.

Since the question states that no work is done by the man swinging, then there is no translational kinetic energy. However, there is rotational kinetic energy.

Therefore, we can state:

Rotational kinetic energy at the bottom = potential energy at the top
Krot = Ut
1/2Iw^2 = mgh
w2 = 2mgh/I

We can have the man swinging assume the shape of a rod, where I = 1/3ML^2

so
w^2 = (2mgh)/(1/3ML^2)
w^2 = 6gh/L^2
w = sqrt (6gh) / L

now I am not sure if L is the distance to the centre of gravity, or if it is the entire length of the rod. However, I assumed it was the distance of the entire rod.

so, w = sqrt (6*9.8*4) / 2 = 7.67rad /s


?
 
perhaps the question is unclear?
 
Well, it seems we are in the very same class and are having the very same problem. I came up with the same solution as yourself, and am having a similar problem completing the question.

I am unsure of what values to use for h and L
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
335
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K