Total Pressure problem in a duct

  • Thread starter Thread starter physixlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 5K views
physixlover
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hello
Please help me, a physical relation which my friend is facing, I'm unable to get my head around..
I created a 2D S-duct, the contours are as follows
1.Static pressure
2.Velocity contours
3. Total pressure gradient graph

intake Velocity 20m/s
Guage pressure is taken as '0' pascals

there is flow separation and reversal at + cruvature
created a rake through the duct to find out the pressure gradient

but the total pressure should be constant in duct, only static pressure changes but i was unable to find out what physical problem is causing such as change as shown in graph

Thanks in Advance
 

Attachments

  • 20-07-2012 18-03-19.png
    20-07-2012 18-03-19.png
    17.2 KB · Views: 621
  • 20-07-2012 18-04-12.png
    20-07-2012 18-04-12.png
    12.9 KB · Views: 632
  • 20-07-2012 18-06-01.jpg
    20-07-2012 18-06-01.jpg
    21 KB · Views: 622
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry for got to attach geometry, rake view
 

Attachments

  • 20-07-2012 18-02-39.png
    20-07-2012 18-02-39.png
    8.8 KB · Views: 651
viscous, Laminar.

Thanks
 
there is probably an offset used in the CFD code for static pressure, like 101325 Pa. There are good numerical reasons for doing this. 0 Pa would then actually be 101325 Pa.

Also, the Casimir effect can cause negative pressures, but that's quantum physics, so naturally nothing works as it's supposed to.
 
Yeah as boneh3ad said total pressure isn't conserved in viscus flows. Did you do any hand calculations as a preliminary check of your results? I don't have much CFD experience personally, but it seems strange that the flow separates only at your first curve and not the second.
 
ever heard "Pressure Recovery"...

a duct with 98% Pressure recovery is nice...

an "S" duct with a 96% recovery (a length-diameter ratio of say 4'ish) is good too...

if all is perfect... you will loose total pressure from boundary layer effects...

incorporate diffusion and see how messy it gets! :O