Total Solid Angle of 6 Squares on Unit Sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the total solid angle not covered by six squares projected onto a unit sphere. Each square has a side length of 0.25 and is positioned pairwise opposite to each other on the sphere.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks hints on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the integration boundaries for θ and φ. Some participants suggest alternative methods involving geometric considerations, such as using portions of the squares or considering the squares as circular caps.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, with some suggesting that the projected squares could be treated as circular caps, which may simplify the calculations. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the need for integration and the implications of treating the projections as circles. There is also a mention of the specific angles and functions that may be involved in the integration process.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I am looking at a unit sphere. Two squares are projected onto the sphere on opposite ends, as shown in figure 1 (the figure only shows one square, the other one is at the opposite end).

There are two more sets of these squares, each set in its own dimension, so there are a total of six squares projected onto the sphere opposite to each other pairwise. The side of each square is 0.25 long. What I want to find is the total solid angle which is not covered by the squares.

Can I get a hint to what the easiest way to do this is? I guess I need to do the integral over θ and phi, but it isn't trivial to me what the boundaries are. Niles.
 

Attachments

  • figure_1.JPG
    figure_1.JPG
    1.4 KB · Views: 410
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Niles! :smile:

I'd choose a quarter of a square (with a 90° angle at the centre), and multiply by 24. :wink:

Or maybe an eighth, and multiply by 48.

(Choosing half a square, cut diagonally, is a bad idea since the angle at the corner isn't 90° !)
 
Hi tiny-tim

Sorry for my late reply. I'm not sure I understand your suggestion, are you implying that I don't need to do any integrals? It just occurred to me that the projected squares can even be circles - does that simplify the matter?Niles.
 
Hi Niles! :smile:
Niles said:
… are you implying that I don't need to do any integrals?

No, you do need to integrate …

your θ will go from 0 to 90° (or 45°), and your r will go from 0 to a function of θ that you'll need to find. :wink:
It just occurred to me that the projected squares can even be circles - does that simplify the matter?

You mean a circular cap?

Then yes, that's lot easier, since your r will be constant.
 
tiny-tim said:
You mean a circular cap?

Yes, exactly! I was searching for that word. OK, I'll keep working on it, I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks.

Best.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K