Totally Bounded in a Function Space

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set of discontinuities D(f) of a uniformly converging function f, defined on metric spaces (X, d) and (Y, p), is contained within the union of the discontinuities D(fn) for n from 1 to infinity. Participants explore the relationship between total boundedness and continuity, suggesting that if all functions fn are continuous at a point x, then f must also be continuous at that point. The approach involves constructing E-nets to demonstrate total boundedness of D(f).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Knowledge of uniform convergence and its implications
  • Familiarity with the concept of discontinuities in functions
  • Basic principles of total boundedness in analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of uniform convergence on continuity in metric spaces
  • Learn about the construction of E-nets and their role in total boundedness
  • Investigate the properties of discontinuities in sequences of functions
  • Explore examples of metric spaces and their applications in analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone studying the properties of functions in metric spaces will benefit from this discussion.

jdcasey9
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (X,d), (Y,p) be metric spaces, and let f,fn: X -> Y with fn->f uniformly on X. Show that D(f)c the union of D(fn) from n=1 to n=infinity, where D(f) is the set of discontinuities of f.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so this looks pretty close to just a straight forward problem of total boundedness, but I'm assuming there is some difference that I'm overlooking. If we just try to show that D(f) is totally bounded we get:

Let E>0. Take B(E, f1), ... , B(E, fn) (where E is the radius and f is the center) over the interval f = (f1,fn) where fi+1 - fi = E/2. Therefore, we have an E-net covering D(f) and D(f) is totally bounded.

Is there something more to show/do or am I way off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ummm, what does total boundedness has to do with this?

Cant you just show:
If x is a point such that all f_n is continuous in x, then f is continuous in x.

That would prove that

\bigcap_n{X\setminus D_{f_n}}\subseteq X\setminus D_f
 
Really? Are you sure? What we are showing matches my definition of totally bounded nearly verbatim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K