Undergrad Tracing parabolic motion with only current velocity and position?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the feasibility of tracing the trajectory of an object using only its current velocity and position. The method proposed involves calculating the time until maximum height is reached and using that to determine the maximum height coordinates (h, k). The equations utilized include the motion equations under constant gravitational force, leading to the conclusion that the trajectory can be accurately modeled by integrating the equations of motion, resulting in the position function: vec{x}(t) = vec{x}_0 + vec{v}_0 t + (1/2) vec{g} t^2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics and projectile motion
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration
  • Knowledge of gravitational force and its effects on motion
  • Proficiency in vector notation and operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations in physics
  • Learn about the principles of projectile motion and its applications
  • Explore numerical methods for solving differential equations
  • Investigate advanced topics in motion under gravity, such as air resistance effects
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical modeling of projectile motion and its applications in real-world scenarios.

question_asker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Using only the current component-wise velocity and position, the trajectory of a projectile needs to be found. The object may change velocity mid flight, an the trajectory should reflect any changes.
Is it possible to trace the trajectory of an object using only its velocity and position, both of which are given as components. My method of doing so involves using the time until max height is reached, and using that time value to calculate the max height itself (h,k), then plugging in the current point to find the constant a in the equation y=a(x-h^2) +k. I used the following equations, but noticed that as the vertical velocity decreased due to gravity, the max height also changes which it doesn't in reality. I am now wondering if what I'm trying to do is possible or not.

$$time_{max} = \frac{v_{y}}{g}\space \space(1)$$
$$x_{max} = x_{current} + v_{x} * time_{max}\space \space(2)$$
$$y_{max} = y_{current} + \frac{{v_{y}}^2}{2a}\space \space(3)$$
$$parabola: a(x-x_{max})^2 + y_{max}\space \space(4)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
question_asker said:
I used the following equations, but noticed that as the vertical velocity decreased due to gravity, the max height also changes which it doesn't in reality.
You are using the remaining climb time to max height which does decrease, and so does the remaining height.
 
Obviously you think about the initial-value problem for motion under the influence of the contant gravitational force of the Earth on a point particle. Just solve the equations of motion, which is very simple:
$$m \ddot{\vec{x}}=m \vec{g} \; \Rightarrow \; \ddot{\vec{x}}=\vec{g}=\text{const}.$$
This is to be solved, assuming the initial condition: ##\vec{v}(0)=\vec{v}_0## and ##\vec{x}(0)=\vec{x}_0##.

Integration the EoM once, using this initial condition gives
$$\int_0^{t} \mathrm{d} t' \ddot{\vec{x}}(t')=\dot{\vec{x}}(t)-\dot{\vec{x}}(0)=\dot{\vec{t}}-\vec{v}_0 = \int_0^t \mathrm{d} t' \vec{g}=g t.$$
So you get
$$\dot{\vec{x}}(t)=\vec{v}_0+\vec{g} t.$$
Integrating once more wrt. time in the analogous way, you finally get the solution
$$\vec{x}(t)=\vec{x}_0 + \vec{v}_0 t + \frac{1}{2} \vec{g} t^2.$$
Of course, now you can use this to figure out all kinds of different representations of this solution and analyze its properties.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
22K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K