Transfer function for a system with lossless gears

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
theone
Messages
81
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/sd66qty27/

I am trying to understand the impedance terms for the equivalent system in (b)

Homework Equations


T1/T2 = N2/N1

The Attempt at a Solution


I just don't understand why the impedance before the gears have to be multiplied by (N2/N1)^2 before they can be added to the impedance after the gear.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is being done here, is that the load is being referred to the gear's output side. Let's say you had an object of moment of inertia L (load) being rotated through a lossless gear system of ratio N2/N1. If you apply Torque T as input, output torque is scaled by the gear ratio. Now if I ask you to choose a different load which behaves just the way this gear + load combination does, what would the moment of inertia of the simplified load be. Try to analyse what the T vs α would come out as in the case with gears and then try to get the same result out of a simple load without the gears. Follow the same approach for the given (albeit more complex) load in your problem statement.
 
Subhash said:
What is being done here, is that the load is being referred to the gear's output side. Let's say you had an object of moment of inertia L (load) being rotated through a lossless gear system of ratio N2/N1. If you apply Torque T as input, output torque is scaled by the gear ratio. Now if I ask you to choose a different load which behaves just the way this gear + load combination does, what would the moment of inertia of the simplified load be. Try to analyse what the T vs α would come out as in the case with gears and then try to get the same result out of a simple load without the gears. Follow the same approach for the given (albeit more complex) load in your problem statement.

Thanks very much!

I also have a couple of questions for (b) of the following question
http://postimg.org/image/uc0c581cb/
which has the solution
http://postimg.org/image/lr6hcp1ql/

1) why isn't an angle defined for the rotation of J2

2) for the fourth equation of motion (written for the second J=0), I can understand the theta 4 term but I don't understand the other term.