Transformation of KE of Gummy Bear in Inelastic Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy transformations of a gummy bear stuck to the ceiling after an inelastic collision. When the gummy bear hits the ceiling, its kinetic energy is converted into thermal energy, sound, and potential energy due to deformation. The potential energy stored in the gummy bear's deformation is likened to the energy in a stretched spring, highlighting a deeper understanding of energy concepts. The conversation also references the Wigner energy from a documentary, drawing parallels to energy transformations in collisions. Overall, the exploration of these energy transformations demonstrates a thoughtful engagement with physics concepts despite limited formal education.
seekingtuva
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is a gummy bear stuck to the ceiling where I work. When it hit the ceiling, some of its kinetic energy would be transformed into thermal energy and some into sound. I'm wondering if some is also stored as potential energy in deforming the gummy bear slightly. Also, are there any other energy transformations that account for its final KE being zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
New potential energies in bonds formed with the roof are what would account for most of the loss I'd say.
There is potential energy in the deformation of the gummy bear, just like there's energy when you stretch a spring (or loss if you unstretch it), if you don't have a physics background, I applaud you for thinking about that one since most people who haven't taken a physics course (and even a lot who have) wouldn't think of that.
 
Cool! Thanks! I knew there were things I wasn't thinking of ... the reason I thought of potential energy due to deformation was because of a documentary I watched on the Windscale reactor fire, specifically the part where Wigner energy accumulated in the graphite. Very different materials and situation, I know, but it got me to thinking about how energy involved in a collision might cause deformations in a material that would not occur spontaneously without that energy input.

I never took physics past high school, but I'm glad I started learning it. It helps keep me sane.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top