Transformerless AC to DC power supply

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around building a transformerless AC to DC power supply circuit. Participants explore the challenges of achieving a smooth DC output from a circuit that includes a full wave rectifier, capacitor, and zener diode, while expressing concerns about safety and circuit design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Safety concerns

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their circuit setup and the unexpected square wave output instead of a smooth DC line, seeking advice on smoothing the waveform.
  • Another participant suggests that the capacitor should smooth the square wave and questions the specifics of the circuit design.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of working with 240V AC, emphasizing the risks involved in the circuit's current state.
  • Some participants propose modifications to the circuit, such as adding a diode to prevent capacitor discharge into the zener diode and using an inductor as part of a passive low pass filter.
  • There are warnings about the potential for electric shock and the importance of using isolation transformers for safety.
  • Discussion includes the implications of incorrect wiring and the grounding of the neutral in relation to safety.
  • One participant expresses a decision to halt the project due to safety concerns and the complexity of the circuit.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the dangers of the circuit and the importance of safety precautions. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of the proposed circuit modifications and the necessity of using a transformer.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the circuit's dependence on specific component values and configurations, as well as the unresolved nature of the circuit's performance and safety implications.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in circuit design, particularly those exploring transformerless power supply concepts, as well as those concerned with electrical safety in high-voltage applications.

Gianna
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Help! I was trying to build an AC to DC power supply circuit without using transformers. I followed the circuit diagrams given online, which has the 240VAC connected to a resistor at the live and a full wave rectifier whose output was connected to a capacitor and a zener diode. The figure is given in the attachment, everything i use is the same except that the resistor R1 is connected to the live and the value is 2.2k.

The output waveform i got was a square wave, not a DC straight line as expected (or close to a straight line). I'm wondering how to eliminate the square wave or how to smooth the square into a close-to-straight line.

Thank you..
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The capacitor smooths the square wave - what's the circuit?
The transformer doesn't do anything to change AC-DC it just reduces the voltage.
The normal design is to reduce the AC voltage to near the final DC voltage with a transformer and then rectify it with diodes.

PLEASE be careful with 240V ac - it can be dangerous (in fact it can kill !)
 
I'm sorry the attchment is given here...
 

Attachments

  • AC dc.jpg
    AC dc.jpg
    10.3 KB · Views: 798
The output waveform looks as if the bridge was only half wave rectified. I checked the diodes, they are fine.
 
The zener gives you square pulses, the size of the capacitor sets the width
See http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_3/4.html (and the next few pages) for values
 
but we cannot get rid of the zener?
 
is there any way of removing the square wave?
 
Gianna said:
The output waveform i got was a square wave, not a DC straight line as expected (or close to a straight line). I'm wondering how to eliminate the square wave or how to smooth the square into a close-to-straight line.

Thank you..

You do realize that the entire circuit it hot, right? For all intents and purposes it's at 240 VAC.

1) Make sure the AC side goes to the squiggely lines of the bridge rectifier.
2) Is your capacitor connected upside down?
3) Foremost,Measure the voltage across the capacitor. Connect both leads of your oscilliscope to the capacitor. This means floating your scope, or you will throw some sparks or burn something out. The ground lead of the oscilliscope is going to be hot. The ground lead on the scope is disconnected from Earth ground with a cheater. This means your scope is now at 240 VAC. Good luck, and don't fry yourself. Make sure the scope chassis doesn't touch ground somewhere.

Now get an electrical technician because you're in over your head.

Need I say, don't handle the scope, 'cept the plastic buttons, until you've unplugged your project?

A battery scope would be nice to have.
 
Last edited:
hmm. Reread my post. I'm afraid I added a great deal to it since you posted.
 
  • #10
Very dangerous..
 
  • #11
Pumblechook said:
Very dangerous..

Phrak said:
You do realize that the entire circuit it hot, right? For all intents and purposes it's at 240 VAC.

1) Make sure the AC side goes to the squiggely lines of the bridge rectifier.
2) Is your capacitor connected upside down?
3) Foremost,Measure the voltage across the capacitor. Connect both leads of your oscilliscope to the capacitor. This means floating your scope, or you will throw some sparks or burn something out. The ground lead of the oscilliscope is going to be hot. The ground lead on the scope is disconnected from Earth ground with a cheater. This means your scope is now at 240 VAC. Good luck, and don't fry yourself. Make sure the scope chassis doesn't touch ground somewhere.

Now get an electrical technician because you're in over your head.

Need I say, don't handle the scope, 'cept the plastic buttons, until you've unplugged your project?

A battery scope would be nice to have.

Gianna said:
is there any way of removing the square wave?

First this is dangerous stuff, as all have said. A cheap transformer should be worth the money for playing it safe.

If you must not use a transformer, then I guess this could do the trick for you:

- Prevent the capacitor from discharging into the zener diode. Put a normal diode
between zener and the capacitor, diode's cathode at the capacitor side.
- Put an inductor in series with the (+) and then
- shunt with a high resistor between the (+) and the (-)
the idea being prevent the capacitor from discharging quickly.

You can choose any large inductor, larger the better, and a large resistor.
Here is the diagram.

=======|>|====L=======(+)
...|...|...|
...Z...C...R
...|...|...|
=====================(-)


What I have described is a passive Low Pass filter (aka the PI filter, as the shape is a PI)

You may also throw in another large capacitor in parallel with the high resistor.

Hope that helps, and be very careful...

sai_2008
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Gianna said:
Help! I was trying to build an AC to DC power supply circuit without using transformers. I followed the circuit diagrams given online, which has the 240VAC connected to a resistor at the live and a full wave rectifier whose output was connected to a capacitor and a zener diode. The figure is given in the attachment, everything i use is the same except that the resistor R1 is connected to the live and the value is 2.2k.

The output waveform i got was a square wave, not a DC straight line as expected (or close to a straight line). I'm wondering how to eliminate the square wave or how to smooth the square into a close-to-straight line.

Thank you..

Why are you doing this? As others have mentioned, it is extremely dangerous to work with this kind of a circuit when you do not know what you are doing. What is your end goal?
 
  • #13
wow, this is a really bad idea. the "ground" will be all over the place and may shock the **** out of you. the line side resistor will be working as a voltage divider, and so you can't just willy-nilly cut it in half without consequence, and even if left as given in the circuit you found, it's value depends on the load from your rectified circuit. at the very least, you'd want to run a circuit like this on an isolation transformer if you planned to probe it or connect it to anything else. seriously, just stop what you're doing.
 
  • #14
mgb_phys said:
The capacitor smooths the square wave - what's the circuit?
The transformer doesn't do anything to change AC-DC it just reduces the voltage.
The normal design is to reduce the AC voltage to near the final DC voltage with a transformer and then rectify it with diodes.

PLEASE be careful with 240V ac - it can be dangerous (in fact it can kill !)

I concur. 240 VAC is especially dangerous once converted to DC, which is known for its ability to deliver a "death grip".
 
  • #16
Hey guys Thank you all.. I'm stopping this project now. Will continue using a transformer when i can get my hands on one.

Thanks again!
 
  • #17
that's good. something else i meant to ask about. is this in the UK and is the 240V neutral actually referenced back to Earth ground? because if so, i don't think moving the resistor to the neutral leg was a good idea.
 
  • #18
The neutral is earthed at the last transfomer and maybe at other points on its way to your house.

Old fashioned TVs used a single diode rectifier, direct rectified mains... would be considered rather dangerous these days. If the mains was connected one way round the chassis could be live.
 
  • #19
that makes sense, then. it would move the rectified ground of that circuit just a diode drop above Earth with the resistor on the line leg. but the improper wiring scenario is a good point, too. another reason to avoid a circuit like this.

edit: 240V here in the US is a different beast. we get 240V off the pole, but it's from a center-tapped transformer with the center tap referenced to ground, so what you actually get are two 120V lines 180 degrees out of phase. and if you do use both to power something with 240V, then neither leg is a ground-referenced neutral.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
4K