Transforming Positive Definite Quadratic Forms: A Simplification Approach

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 3K views
Messages
5,706
Reaction score
1,592
I'm having a bit of a brain fart here. Given a positive definite quadratic form
[tex]\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j[/tex]
is it possible to re-write this as
[tex]\sum k_i x_i^2 + \left( \sum \beta_i x_i \right)^2[/tex]
with all the ki positive? I feel like the answer should be obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Office_Shredder said:
I'm having a bit of a brain fart here. Given a positive definite quadratic form
[tex]\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j[/tex]
is it possible to re-write this as
[tex]\sum k_i x_i^2 + \left( \sum \beta_i x_i \right)^2[/tex]
with all the ki positive? I feel like the answer should be obvious

Yes. Every quadratic form

[tex]\sum \alpha_{i,j} x_i x_j[/tex]

determines a matrix [itex](\alpha_{i,j})_{i,j}[/itex]. The only thing you need to do is diagonalize this matrix.
 
Note that the matrix corresponding to any quadratic form is symmetric (we take [itex]a_{ij}= a_{ji}[/itex] equal to 1/2 the coefficient of [itex]x_ix_j[/itex]. Therefore, the matrix corresponding to a quadratic form is always diagonalizable.