Transition Probability of Hydrogen atom in an electric field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the transition probability of a hydrogen atom in an external electric field, specifically focusing on how to compute the matrix elements of the perturbed Hamiltonian when the electric field is not aligned with the z direction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the computation of matrix elements for the perturbed Hamiltonian, questioning the necessity of aligning the electric field with the z direction and considering the use of a dot product with the dipole moment vector operator.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on using a unit vector in the direction of the electric field or suggest rotating the coordinate system for simplification. There is an acknowledgment of a missed detail regarding the dot product in the original post, indicating an ongoing exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, including the implications of the electric field's direction and the appropriate mathematical representations needed for the transition probability calculations.

jmm5872
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A hydrogen atom is in its ground state and is subject to an external electric field of

E = ε(\hat{x}+\hat{y}+2\hat{z})e-t/\tau

I'm confused as to how to compute the matrix elements of the perturbed hamiltonian since this is not in the z direction.

Would I have to do something like this?

H'ba = -pE = -qεe-t/\tau<\psib|(\hat{x}+\hat{y}+2\hat{z})|\psia>

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember this stuff correctly, then yes. You're just using a unit vector in the direction of the electric field rather than in the z direction. Alternatively, you could rotate your coordinate system so that the electric field points in the z direction, solve the problem, and then rotate your solution back to the original coordinates.
 
Shouldn't you take the dot product of the electric field with the dipole moment vector operator: ##\vec{p} = q\vec{r}= q(x \hat{x} + y \hat{y}+z \hat{z})##?
 
Oh yes, somehow I completely missed the fact that there was no dot product in the original post.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K