Translating cylinder in viscous fluid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the problem of calculating the force exerted on a translating cylinder of radius R in a viscous fluid, specifically under the conditions of low Reynolds number (Re << 1). The Navier-Stokes equations simplify to the Stokes equations, leading to the use of polar coordinates and a stream function defined by the equations provided. The participant identifies a challenge in satisfying boundary conditions, ultimately recognizing the situation as Stokes' paradox. The solution suggests utilizing Oseen's approximation method for further analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' equations and their application in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and stream functions
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in fluid mechanics
  • Basic concepts of Reynolds number and its significance in fluid flow
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Oseen's approximation method for resolving Stokes' paradox
  • Learn about the application of boundary layer theory in viscous fluid flow
  • Explore advanced topics in fluid dynamics, such as the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving fluid dynamics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in solving problems related to viscous flow and boundary conditions in fluid mechanics.

MichielM
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a cylinder of radius R translating (in radial direction) with velocity U in a viscous fluid at Re<<1. Find the force exerted on the cylinder per unit length

Homework Equations


Re<<1 so the Navier-Stokes equation simplifies to the Stokes equation:
\nabla P=\mu \nabla^2 v
The cylinder makes use of polar coordinates useful so the stream function for this problem is defined as:
\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \theta}=u_r
-\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial r}=u_{\theta}

The Attempt at a Solution


Given the problem statement and the choice for polar coordinates, the boundary conditions become:
u_r(R)=U \cos\theta
u_{\theta}(R)=-U \sin\theta
u_r(\infty)=u_{\theta}(\infty)=0

With help of the continuity equation the Stokes equation can be turned into:
\nabla^4 \Psi=0
And taking \Psi=\sin \theta f(r) the equation further 'simplifies' to:
\left[\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}-\frac{1}{r^2}\right]^2f(r)=0

A general solution to this equation is f(r)=A r^3+Br \ln r + C r+\frac{D}{r}

Using the definition of the stream function it follows that:
u_r=\frac{f(r)}{r}\cos \theta and u_{\theta}=-\sin\theta \frac{\partial f(r)}{\partial r}.

The boundary conditions for f(r) then become:
f(R)=U R
\frac{\partial f(R)}{\partial r}=U
\frac{f(\infty)}{\infty}\cos \theta=0
-\sin \theta \frac{\partial f(\infty)}{\partial r}=0

The two infinity conditions yield A=B=C=0 and for the other two I find:

\frac{D}{R}=U R and \frac{-D}{R^2}=U

And that is where I get stuck, because I will not be able to satisfy these conditions, so what did I do wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mmm, seems like I found the famous Stokes' paradox. For other people reading this and wondering how to solve it: take a look at Oseen's approximation method
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K