Gravity-induced viscous flow around a cylinder

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the gravity-induced viscous flow of a liquid around a cylinder. The original poster describes the scenario where a viscous liquid is discharged onto the surface of a cylinder, forming a film, and seeks to determine the thickness of this layer as a function of various parameters including density, viscosity, and flow rate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the assumptions of incompressibility and the applicability of the Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates. There is mention of boundary conditions and the challenge of relating the flow around a cylinder to simpler cases like flow down an inclined plane.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring the analogy of flow down an inclined plane as a potential starting point for understanding the flow around the cylinder. Others are questioning how to effectively extrapolate findings from this simpler scenario to the cylindrical geometry in question.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the gradual variation of film thickness with respect to the angle around the cylinder, which may influence the accuracy of the approximations being considered.

member 428835

Homework Statement


A viscous liquid with density and viscosity ##\rho## and ##\mu## respectively is discharged onto the upper surface of a cylinder with radius ##a## at a volume flow rate ##Q##. This is a gravity-driven flow, and it forms a film around the cylinder--see picture.

What is the thickness $h$ of the layer as a function ##\theta##, ##a##, ##\rho##, ##\mu##, ##g##, and ##Q##.

Homework Equations


Navier-Stokes
Continuity

The Attempt at a Solution


First off, let's assume the flow is incompressible and viscous-dominated, Newtonian, steady, 2-D, and that no pressure gradient is present. Then continuity and Navier-Stokes equations are $$\nabla \cdot \vec{V} = 0$$ and $$g\hat{j} = \nu \nabla^2 \vec{V}$$
Now if we adopt a cylindrical coordinate system where ##x=rcos\theta## and ##y=r\sin\theta## we have
$$\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial (r u_r)}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u_\theta}{\partial \theta}=0$$ and
$$g(\sin\theta \hat{e_r}+\cos\theta \hat{e_\theta})=\nu \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial r}\left(r \frac{\partial \vec{V} }{\partial r} \right)+\frac{1}{r^2} \frac{\partial^2 \vec{V}}{\partial \theta^2}$$

where ##\vec{V} = u_\theta \hat{e_\theta}+u_r\hat{e_r}##. Boundary conditions would be no slip along the surface, ##\vec{V} = 0## at ##r=a##. Another would be no stress along the surface of the thin film. And lastly we would have some incoming velocity related to ##Q##, which would be the velocity at ##r=a,\theta=0##. Any ideas how to proceed?

Thanks so much!
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I would start out by looking at flow down an inclined plane of constant angle, and seeing where that takes me. It's got to be a pretty good approximation for most angles on the cylinder.

Chet
 
Thanks for the response Chet! I did this but how can you extrapolate this to a cylinder?
 
A Google search turned up useful information about this problem .

Search on ' viscous thin film flow around a cylinder '
 
Last edited:
joshmccraney said:
Thanks for the response Chet! I did this but how can you extrapolate this to a cylinder?
If the thickness is varying very gradually with theta, it should give an accurate result locally, except for at the leading and trailing edges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K