MHB Translation of Sentence Into An Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter zolton5971
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Translation
AI Thread Summary
The sentence "The difference of a number times 8 and 5 is 3" can be translated into the equation 8c - 5 = 3, where c represents the unknown number. To derive this equation, multiply the variable c by 8 and then subtract 5 from the result, setting it equal to 3. Participants in the discussion confirm that this equation is correct and clarify that it can be solved for c if needed. Overall, the focus is on accurately translating the verbal statement into a mathematical equation. The final equation is 8c - 5 = 3.
zolton5971
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Translate the sentence into an equation.

The difference of a number times 8 and 5 is 3.

Use the variable c for the unknown number.

How do I write this as an equation?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zolton5971 said:
Translate the sentence into an equation.

The difference of a number times 8 and 5 is 3.

Use the variable c for the unknown number.

How do I write this as an equation?

Starting with $$c$$ - how would you represent multiplying this by 8?

edit: these do seem hard to begin with but get clearer with practice :)
 
Would it be 8c*5=3?

Im struggling with this one!
 
zolton5971 said:
Translate the sentence into an equation.

The difference of a number times 8 and 5 is 3.

Use the variable c for the unknown number.

How do I write this as an equation?

The difference of a number $a$ and $b$ means that you substract the number $b$ from $a$.

You have a number $c$ times $8$, so you multiply $c$ by $8$ ($8 \cdot c$) and you want to find the difference from this number and $5$ and this difference is equal to $3$.

So you get the following equation:

$$8c-5=3$$
 
Ok thanks so the answer is 8c-5=3? Do I need to simplify it at all?
 
zolton5971 said:
Ok thanks so the answer is 8c-5=3?

Yes! (Smile)

zolton5971 said:
Do I need to simplify it at all?

You could solve for $c$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top