Translational and rotational kinetic energy-Mass Unknown

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a hollow, thin-walled sphere filled with a liquid, rolling down an incline. The objective is to determine the mass of the liquid, given the sphere's mass and its moment of inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between translational and rotational kinetic energy, noting that the center of mass speed is independent of mass and radius. There is uncertainty about how to proceed after calculating translational speed. Some participants question the treatment of the sphere's motion and the implications of the moment of inertia provided.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding finding acceleration and labeling the mass of the liquid as "m." Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly concerning the rolling behavior of the spheres and the assumptions about the liquid's motion.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of information regarding the radius of the sphere, and assumptions about the liquid's rotation are being discussed. The problem's constraints and the moment of inertia provided are central to the ongoing dialogue.

Crusader711
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A hollow, thin-walled sphere (ICM = 2MR2/3) of mass 20 kg is completely filled with a liquid of unknown mass. The sphere is released at the top of a plane inclined at 30° to the horizontal, and it rolls 20 m to the bottom in 3.6 s. What is the mass of the liquid?



2.My approach is translational and rotational kinetic energy, first off. I know that for rolling spheres the v-cm is not dependent upon the mass nor radius of the objects. So I come up with a translational speed but I'm not certain where to go from there. But the problem wants the mass of the liquid. I have two different sphere's in theory, a solid and a thin-walled version.



3. Looking for a lead into the next step...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Crusader711! :smile:
Crusader711 said:
I know that for rolling spheres the v-cm is not dependent upon the mass nor radius of the objects.

for a particular shape, yes
I have two different sphere's in theory, a solid and a thin-walled version.

But you're given the moment of inertia anyway.

Since we're not told the radius of the sphere, I think we're supposed to assume that the liquid does not rotate.

So find the acceleration, call the mass of the liquid "m", and carry on from there. :smile:
 
Rolling verses Frictionless

Would we treat the spheres differently?

thin-walled sphere rolling...

...then solid sphere with liquid, liquid sphere moving down incline (not rolling), but we have to account for the ICM of the thin-walled shell too?

Any thoughts?
 
(just got up :zzz:)

i assume "ICM" means moment of inertia?

you are given the moment of inertia and the mass, why do you need to know anything else?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K