Traveling at the speed of light and time travel?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the implications of traveling at the speed of light, particularly regarding time dilation as described by Einstein's Special Relativity. Participants clarify that while time appears to slow down for observers moving at relativistic speeds, it does not stop for the traveler. The consensus is that reaching 100% of the speed of light is not feasible within current physical laws, and any inquiry into such a scenario requires a new theoretical framework. The conversation emphasizes the relativity of time perception between different observers and the constancy of the speed of light across all frames of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's Special Relativity
  • Familiarity with concepts of time dilation and relative motion
  • Knowledge of the speed of light as a universal constant (299,792,458 m/s)
  • Basic grasp of the Doppler effect in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Einstein's Special Relativity on time travel
  • Explore the concept of time dilation through practical examples and thought experiments
  • Investigate the Doppler effect and its relation to light frequency changes
  • Research theoretical frameworks that extend beyond current physical laws, such as quantum gravity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in the complexities of time, light, and the fundamental laws governing the universe.

Dieterich
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I understand that modern day Physics allows for travel into the future, but not the past. I understand that time slows down the closer and closer you get to the speed of light, so that you never exceed that limit. But what if you meet it? I know because of the laws of Physics, you couldn't meet it, only 99.99% of it, but what if you reach 100% the speed of light?

I understand this violates the currently accepted laws, but would time completely stop for the observer traveling at 100% the speed of light? Because any slight movement of the hand, or head or any ligament would then exceed the limit...


Again, correct me if any of my understanding is wrong, I'm relatively new to Physics and I really enjoy it.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Dieterich said:
I understand that time slows down the closer and closer you get to the speed of light, so that you never exceed that limit.

Time is relative. It only slows down relative to people moving slower than you. You would perceive time to go on as normal.

what if you reach 100% the speed of light?

It doesn't really make sense to ask such a question. "What would the law of physics be like if there were no laws of physics?" My point is that you cannot use physics to analyze a situation in which the laws of physics do not hold. You would need a whole new theory to describe it!

That's not to say that you shouldn't ask the question, just that there is no answer that people can give you given our current knowledge of physical laws. Indeed, it is questions like these that tend to inspire new ideas in physics.
 
Last edited:
Dieterich said:
I understand that modern day Physics allows for travel into the future, but not the past. I understand that time slows down the closer and closer you get to the speed of light, so that you never exceed that limit. But what if you meet it? I know because of the laws of Physics, you couldn't meet it, only 99.99% of it, but what if you reach 100% the speed of light?

I understand this violates the currently accepted laws, but would time completely stop for the observer traveling at 100% the speed of light? Because any slight movement of the hand, or head or any ligament would then exceed the limit...


Again, correct me if any of my understanding is wrong, I'm relatively new to Physics and I really enjoy it.

Your understanding of basic Special Relativity is wrong. When you move, your time doesn't slow down. For example, do you see your time slowing down? After all, according to the creatures on Alpha Centauri, you are moving. Do you see any time dilation effects?

If A moves relative to B, B will see A's time "slowing down". But it works the other way around as well. Since there's nothing special about B, one can also be in A's frame, and A can see that B is moving. A will see B's time slowing down. But both A and B sees no difference in their own respective time.

This is one of the most common mistakes of anyone who misunderstood Special Relativity.

Zz.
 
Dieterich said:
I understand that modern day Physics allows for travel into the future, but not the past. I understand that time slows down the closer and closer you get to the speed of light, so that you never exceed that limit. But what if you meet it? I know because of the laws of Physics, you couldn't meet it, only 99.99% of it, but what if you reach 100% the speed of light?

I understand this violates the currently accepted laws, but would time completely stop for the observer traveling at 100% the speed of light? Because any slight movement of the hand, or head or any ligament would then exceed the limit...


Again, correct me if any of my understanding is wrong, I'm relatively new to Physics and I really enjoy it.

What you should first understand is that if I see you traveling at 99.99% the speed of light, and you emit light in your forward direction, that light is traveling at the speed of light relative to you, and it is also traveling at the speed of light relative to me.

i.e. no matter how fast you go, light going in the same direction as you is always traveling at 300 000 m/s relative to you, whether you emit it or I do.
 
Dr Lots-o'watts said:
What you should first understand is that if I see you traveling at 99.99% the speed of light, and you emit light in your forward direction, that light is traveling at the speed of light relative to you, and it is also traveling at the speed of light relative to me.

i.e. no matter how fast you go, light going in the same direction as you is always traveling at 300 000 m/s relative to you, whether you emit it or I do.

Taking into consideration what you said and as well as what ZZ said, if A is moving relative to B, and B emits light in a forward direction, will the light appear to slow down to A?
 
Dieterich said:
Taking into consideration what you said and as well as what ZZ said, if A is moving relative to B, and B emits light in a forward direction, will the light appear to slow down to A?

Nope, the speed of light is constant from every frame of reference. They would observe the frequency of the light to be different though, due to the doppler effect and also time dilation/space contraction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
16K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K