Traveling at the speed of light in orbit around a black hole

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of gravitational time dilation and the perception of speed for objects orbiting a black hole, particularly in relation to the speed of light. Participants explore theoretical implications of these concepts, addressing both the relativistic effects on time and the apparent motion of objects near a black hole.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Stephen Hawking's assertion that time slows down for objects in orbit around a black hole due to its mass, questioning the specifics of this effect.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of black holes, emphasizing that it is density rather than mass that defines them.
  • One participant questions the reasoning behind the claim that time would be cut down by half, seeking clarification on the example used.
  • Another participant suggests that the effects of gravitational time dilation imply that an observer on Earth would see an object falling into a black hole moving slower as it approaches the event horizon.
  • There is confusion regarding how an object traveling at the speed of light would appear from Earth, given the time dilation effects caused by the black hole.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of traveling at a large fraction of the speed of light and how gravitational time dilation would affect the perception of time for distant observers.
  • One participant emphasizes that the speed of light is always measured as c locally, but the average speed in curved spacetime can differ based on the frame of reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how time dilation affects the perception of speed for objects near a black hole. There is no consensus on the implications of these effects, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the relationship between speed, time dilation, and the nature of light in curved spacetime.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of measuring speed and time in different frames of reference, particularly in curved spacetime, and the assumptions that underlie these measurements. There are unresolved questions about the specifics of gravitational time dilation and its effects on perceived motion.

Somedude99
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Deleted

Deleted
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Somedude99 said:
Stephen Hawking says that orbiting around a black hole would slow down time for those in orbit because of the incredibly large mass.
A black hole does not have to have an incredibly large mass. It's not a large mass that makes a black hole, it's a large density.

Somedude99 said:
According to Hawking time would be cut down by half when in orbit.
Why half? Are you just using that as an example?

Somedude99 said:
What happens? If light is constant, from Earth it would look like it's only orbiting at the speed of light, but in reality it should be going faster.
Here I assume you mean "near the speed of light," rather than "at the speed of light."

I don't think anything in your example really requires a circular orbit. All the same ideas apply if you just let the space traveler A fall straight towards the black hole.

To an observer B hovering a millimeter outside the event horizon, A passes by at very nearly the speed of light. But to a distant observer C on Earth, A appears to be moving more and more slowly as he approaches the hotizon, due to gravitational time dilation: clocks deep in a gravity well run more slowly. So the effect as seen by C is in the opposite direction compared to what you'd been thinking: A's velocity seems reduced, not increased.
 
I deleted the message because I thought I would find out myself. Since you replied already I'll try to explain further.

If the ship at the black hole appears from Earth to be moving slower in time... then if they were traveling at the speed of light how would they look from earth? The black hole is slowing down time but they are still traveling at the speed of light, so how do they end up?
 
In other words, the ship in orbit should be traveling at near the speed of light, viewable from earth. However, the black hole slows down their time so they should be going slower. But how can light be going slower? How can time distort if two different perspectives view time differently?
 
Somedude99 said:
I deleted the message because I thought I would find out myself. Since you replied already I'll try to explain further.

If the ship at the black hole appears from Earth to be moving slower in time... then if they were traveling at the speed of light how would they look from earth? The black hole is slowing down time but they are still traveling at the speed of light, so how do they end up?
It's impossible for an object with mass to travel at the speed of light, but you could imagine the ship traveling at some large fraction of the speed of light, say 0.99999c. But note that even in the absence of gravity, if something is traveling at a large fraction of light speed their clocks will be slowed down in your rest frame, not sped up...so in the case of a black hole, the gravitational time dilation would just slow down their clock even further as measured by distant observers.

edit: Maybe you're not talking about clock rates at all, but just the speed an object appears to be moving? Note that in relativity the "speed" of anything depends on your choice of coordinate system for defining the position and time coordinates of different events (with "speed" as change in position coordinate/change in time coordinate)--light is only guaranteed to have a speed of c in a special class of coordinate systems called inertial coordinate systems, the type of coordinate system used in a large region of curved spacetime like around a black hole will be a non-inertial one, since inertial systems can only be defined in large regions in non-curved spacetimes (no gravity). However, by the equivalence principle, if you pick a small region of a larger spacetime, a coordinate system constructed out of free-falling rulers and clocks will measure something close to what would be measured in an inertial coordinate system, including the fact that light beams in this region would move at c; so in this sense, it is still true that light moves at c in any "local region" of a curved spacetime like the spacetime around a black hole.
 
Last edited:
Somedude99 said:
In other words, the ship in orbit should be traveling at near the speed of light, viewable from earth.
Nope. You're assuming this, but it's not true. See #2.
 
The speed of light measured at a point is always c, in all frames and all spacetimes.

But if we go beyond that and measure the average speed between two points there are three situations to consider:

An inertial frame in flat spacetime (curved spacetimes have no inertial frames)
In this frame the speed of light is c in all situations.

An accelerating frame in flat spacetime
In this frame the speed of light is not c.

In curved spacetime
The speed of light is not c.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K