Triangle inequality w/ Complex Numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the triangle inequality for complex numbers, specifically the statement ||z|-|w|| ≤ |z-w| ≤ |z|+|w|. Participants explore various approaches to the proof, including algebraic manipulations and logical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes starting from the squared terms of the triangle inequality but questions their own reasoning.
  • Another participant points out that assuming what one is trying to prove undermines the argument.
  • A different participant provides a revised proof approach, suggesting that ||z|-|w|| ≤ |z-w| can be derived from |z|-|w| ≤ |z|.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of using ordering with complex numbers, emphasizing the need for careful reasoning.
  • One participant attempts to show the right side of the inequality by contradiction, but others challenge the assumptions made in this approach.
  • Another participant summarizes their proof steps, but questions arise regarding the assumptions made in the proof.
  • Clarifications about the definition of |z| are discussed, with some participants asserting that the triangle inequality is the subject of the proof rather than an established fact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of various proof strategies, with no consensus reached on the correctness of the approaches or the assumptions made. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proof of the triangle inequality for complex numbers.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of not assuming properties of complex numbers that may not hold, particularly regarding ordering. The discussion reflects various interpretations of the triangle inequality and its implications for complex numbers.

mynameisfunk
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
given z, w\inC, and |z|=([conjugate of z]z)1/2 , prove ||z|-|w|| \leq |z-w| \leq |z|+|w|

I squared all three terms and ended up with :
-2|z||w| \leq |-2zw| \leq 2|z||w|
I know this leaves the right 2 equal to each other but i figured if i show that since there exists a z\geqw\geq0, then |z-w| > |z|+|w| would be impossible.

Can someone tell me if they think I screwed up or I am not done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You assumed what you're trying to prove, so that doesn't really work.

Note that for any two complex numbers z and w, we have that zw* + z*w ≤ 2|z||w|. Now,
|z+w|2 = (z+w)*(z+w) = (z*+w*)(z+w) = zz* + zw* + z*w + ww* ≤ |z|2 + 2|z||w| + |w|2 = (|z|+|w|)2. This proves that |z+w| ≤ |z|+|w|. Can you prove the rest from here?

Edit: Fixed less than or equal to signs.
 
Thank You for the help. I have redone the proof. here is what I've got:

It is obvious that |z|-|w|\leq|z|, which yields |z|-|w|\leq|z-w|. From this, we have that ||z|-|w||\leq|z-w|. This shows the left inequality. The right-side I will show by contradiction. Assume |z-w|>|z|+|w|, this implies that w<0\Rightarrow|z-w|=|z|+|w|>|z|+|w|, which is a contradiction showing that |z-w| is at most equal to |z|+|w|. Done.

Could anyone let me know if they think this is ok?
 
mynameisfunk said:
It is obvious that |z|-|w|\leq|z|, which yields |z|-|w|\leq|z-w|.

How do you use the first inequality to arrive at the second one? I'm not following your reasoning here.

From this, we have that ||z|-|w||\leq|z-w|.

You can do better than that. Use the fact that |z-w| ≥ |z|-|w| and |z-w| ≥ |w|-|z| to arrive at your conclusion.

The right-side I will show by contradiction. Assume |z-w|>|z|+|w|, this implies that w<0\Rightarrow|z-w|=|z|+|w|>|z|+|w|, which is a contradiction showing that |z-w| is at most equal to |z|+|w|.

First, you need to remember that you're working with complex numbers here, so you can't say anything concerning their ordering. Second, you've assumed a lot of things which aren't necessarily true so I would scrap this approach. Everything that you want to derive for this part follows from the inequality |z+w| ≤ |z|+|w|.
 
||z|-|w|| \leq |z-w| \leq |z|+ |w|

pf: Left Side:
|z| \leq |z-w+w|
|z|-|w| \leq |z-w|
||z|-|w|| \leq |z-w|

Right Side:
|z| \leq |z| + 2|w|
|z-w| \leq |z| + |w|

Hows that?
 
I'm not sure if you are hiding the use of the actuall formula for |z| in your proof but to me, it looks like you are just assuming the result is true to prove it is true.
 
|z| = (z\bar{z})^{\frac{1}{2}}

Is that what you were asking for?

Also, I now see that the right side is true by the triangle inequality.
 
Last edited:
You can't say it's true by the triangle inequality because the triangle inequality is what you are proving. You need to prove that your definition of |z| implies ||z|-|w||\leq|z-w|\leq|z|+|w|.
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K