I'm trying to figure out how to integrate a data set, without knowing the function. While doing this, I got to thinking about this:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If the definite integral of a function can be represented by the area under that function, bound by the x axis, then shouldn't:

[itex]\int_{a}^{b}2x\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x} = A = 1/2b*h[/itex]

Where the integral is bound by a = 0 and b = 2, and the triangle's base is 2 and height is 2.

but rather,

[itex]\int_{0}^{2}2x\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} x} = 4[/itex]

and

[itex]A = 2[/itex]

Where's the discrepancy?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Triangles and Definite Integrals

Loading...

Similar Threads - Triangles Definite Integrals | Date |
---|---|

B Question about a limit definition | Feb 27, 2018 |

I Proof that lattice points can't form an equilateral triangle | Feb 8, 2017 |

I Fnd the area A of the triangle with the given the vertices | Nov 30, 2016 |

I Question about Hydrostatic Force? | Jul 18, 2016 |

I Triangle problem | Apr 8, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**