Tricky complex numbers question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the complex quadratic equation z² + (−3 + 2i)z + (5 − i) = 0. The initial attempt incorrectly separates the equation into real and imaginary parts, leading to confusion. The correct approach involves applying the quadratic formula directly to the original equation, which will yield two distinct complex solutions. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing that z can be a complex number rather than assuming it can be separated into real and imaginary components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula
  • Knowledge of separating real and imaginary parts of complex equations
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the quadratic formula to complex coefficients
  • Explore the properties of complex conjugates in quadratic equations
  • Learn about complex number operations in algebra
  • Investigate the geometric interpretation of complex solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying complex numbers, mathematicians solving quadratic equations, and educators teaching advanced algebra concepts.

thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Harder: given that
√(−15 − 8i) = ±(1 − 4i) obtain the two solutions of the equation
z² + (−3 + 2i)z + 5 − i = 0

Homework Equations



I can easily prove √(−15 − 8i) = ±(1 − 4i) but that's not important

The Attempt at a Solution



I would of thought that a compex solution would be a + b and a - b, but a quick glance at the answers shows 2 completely different complex numbers - no complex conjugates.

Well seperating the equation into real and imaginary parts then solving for z:
real:
(z² - 3z + 5) = 0
=> z = \frac{3\pm i \sqrt{11}}{2}

imag:
(2z - 1) = 0
=> z = 0.5

This isn't taking me anywhere nice...

Ideas!? :)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't separate it into real and imaginary parts like that, z itself is probably complex. Just use the quadratic formula on the original equation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K