Trig: Writing the equation for vertical asymptote of a secant function?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the equation for the vertical asymptote of the secant function, specifically for the function y=4*sec(pi*x). The correct formula for the vertical asymptote is derived as x = 1/2 + k, where k represents integer multiples of the period. The user identifies that the presence of pi in the function affects the asymptote's calculation, necessitating the use of the reciprocal of the coefficient of x in the secant function. The relationship between the secant function and its reciprocal nature to cosine is also highlighted as a key concept in understanding the asymptote's derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of secant functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of vertical asymptotes in trigonometric functions
  • Familiarity with the general form of trigonometric equations, specifically y=Asin[B(x-C)]+D
  • Basic grasp of reciprocal functions and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of vertical asymptotes for y=sec(Bx) functions
  • Learn about the periodicity of trigonometric functions and how it affects asymptotes
  • Explore the relationship between secant and cosine functions in detail
  • Practice solving problems involving vertical asymptotes in various trigonometric contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying trigonometry, particularly those focusing on secant functions and vertical asymptotes, as well as educators seeking to clarify these concepts in a teaching context.

DinosaurEgg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


mk7orc.png

Homework Equations


How did they come up with \frac{1}{2}+k for the equation of the vertical asymptote? I understand everything else except this.

The Attempt at a Solution


On this particular exercise, I graphed it and saw that each of my vertical dashed lines were all one whole unit apart. I've tried this method with another problem that had the dashed lines separated 2 units apart, took that 2, and multiplied it by the x=\prod/2 + k\prod. The result was \prod+2k\prod, which was correct.

I tried it with other numbers and have gotten the correct answer, but I have a feeling I'm still doing something wrong. Because with this particular one using my method, I input \prod/2 + k\prod as my answer for the vertical asymptote which was incorrect. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would be right if the equation were y=4*sec(x). It's not. It's y=4*sec(pi*x). There's already a pi in the equation for y. y=4*sec(pi*x) doesn't have an asymptote at x=pi/2.
 
I noticed multiplying the vertical asymptote formula/equation by 1/pi cancels out the pi, resulting in that 1/2+k... but where did they get 1/pi from? Does that have any relation to secant being 1/cos?
 
Worked on another problem set up similarly and I think I got it!

I noticed that simply taking the 'B' (like in the y=Asin[B(x-C)]+D formula), turning it into the reciprocal (1/B), and thennnn multiplying it by \prod/2 + k\prod gets me the right asymptote. This *does* relate to inverse trig functions (ie, sec being the reciprocal of cos), right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K