MHB Trigonometric absolute value integral

AI Thread Summary
The limit of the integral \lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \, dx evaluates to \frac{2}{\pi}. This conclusion is drawn from the periodic nature of |\sin x|, which occupies a consistent fraction of the area in any rectangle of the form [0, \pi]. As n increases, the area under |\sin(nx)| approaches this fraction in the unit square. The argument relies on partitioning the unit square into smaller rectangles that align with the sine function's periodicity. Ultimately, the area of the leftover segments diminishes to zero, confirming the limit.
jacobi1
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Evaluate [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \ dx. [/math]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacobi said:
Evaluate [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \ dx. [/math]

[sp]Starting from the definite integral...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{n}} \sin (n x)\ d x = \frac{2}{n}\ (1)$

... You can conclude that...

$\displaystyle \int_{0}^{1} |\sin (n x)| \ d x \sim \lfloor \frac{n}{\pi} \rfloor\ \frac{2}{n} = \frac{2}{\pi}\ (2)$

... so that the requested limit is $\frac{2}{\pi}$... [/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
[sp]Notice first that $$\int_0^\pi|\sin x|\,dx = \int_0^\pi\sin x\,dx = -\cos\pi + \cos0 = 2.$$ Thus the area under the graph of $|\sin x|$ occupies a fraction $\dfrac2\pi$ of the rectangle $[0,\pi] \times [0,1].$

Since $|\sin x|$ is periodic with period $\pi$, the same result will be true in any rectangle of the form $[x,x+\pi] \times [0,1].$

If we shrink the $x$-axis by a factor $1/n$ then the same argument shows that the area under the graph of $|\sin (nx)|$ occupies a fraction $\dfrac2\pi$ of any rectangle of the form $\bigl[x,x+\frac\pi n\bigr] \times [0,1].$

The unit square can be partitioned as the union of a number of such rectangles, together with a bit left over at the end. As $n$ increases, the area of this leftover bit will decrease to $0$. Thus when $n$ is large, the area under the graph of $|\sin (nx)|$ occupies a fraction close to $\dfrac2\pi$ of the unit square.

Therefore [math]\lim_{n \to \infty} \int_0^1 | \sin(nx)| \, dx = \frac2\pi. [/math]

[That argument could be adapted so as to sound more rigorous. But in this case I think that the informal, geometric approach works best.][/sp]
 
Yes, Opalg and chisigma, you are both correct. :)
My solution is slightly different:
The function sin(nx) has many oscillations over [0,1]. For our present purpose, an 'oscillation' is defined as a 'hump' of the sine function above the x axis-where it starts from 0, increases to a maximum, and then decreases back to 0. Finding the area of one of those oscillations, multiplying that area by the number of oscillations, multiplying by two (because the number of 'humps' is the same above and below the x axis) and then taking the limit will give us the answer.
The first [math] x \neq 0[/math] where [math] \sin(nx)=0 [/math] is at [math] x= \frac{\pi}{n}[/math]. Therefore, the area of anyone of the oscillations is

[math] \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{n}} \sin(nx) \ dx = \frac{2}{n} [/math].

The number of oscillations is just the frequency- [math] f = \frac{1}{T}[/math], where T is period. The period of [math] \sin(bx) [/math] is [math] \frac{2 \pi}{b}[/math], and so the frequency of sin(nx) is [math] \frac{n}{2 \pi} [/math]. Putting it all together, we have
[math] 2 \times \frac{2}{n} \times \frac{n}{2 \pi} = \frac{2}{\pi} [/math].
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top