MHB Can You Prove That $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$ Without a Calculator?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that $\tan 50^{\circ} > 1.18$ without a calculator. A participant presents a solution using the first eight terms of the McLaurin series for the tangent function, which approximates $\tan \left(\frac{5}{18} \pi\right)$ to be approximately 1.182468. This approximation confirms that $\tan 50^{\circ}$ exceeds 1.18. Other participants express interest in exploring alternative methods to demonstrate the inequality. The conversation emphasizes the validity of the McLaurin series approach while inviting further contributions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Without the help of calculator, show that $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Without the help of calculator, show that $\tan 50^{\circ}>1.18$

[sp]Considering the first eight of the McLaurin series of the function tan x...

$\displaystyle \tan x \sim x + \frac{1}{3}\ x^{3} + \frac{2}{15}\ x^{5} + \frac {17}{315}\ x^{7}\ (1)$... setting in (1) $x = \frac{5}{18}\ \pi$ You obtain... $\displaystyle \tan x \sim 1.182468$[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
[sp]Considering the first eight of the McLaurin series of the function tan x...

$\displaystyle \tan x \sim x + \frac{1}{3}\ x^{3} + \frac{2}{15}\ x^{5} + \frac {17}{315}\ x^{7}\ (1)$... setting in (1) $x = \frac{5}{18}\ \pi$ You obtain... $\displaystyle \tan x \sim 1.182468$[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

Thanks for participating, chisigma and I think your solution is a good one! :o

I still welcome others to give a stab at it, as I can tell there is other way(perhaps many other ways) to prove the inequality to be true.
 
I will omit the degree sign ($^\circ$) in the proof. Note
\[
\tan 150 = \tan (180 - 30) = \frac{\tan 180 - \tan 30}{1 + \tan 180 \tan 30} = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}.
\]
We will use the formula:
\[
\tan 3a = \frac{3 \tan a - \tan^3 a}{1 - 3 \tan^2 a}.
\]
So we have:
\[
-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \tan 150 = \tan (50 \cdot 3) = \frac{3 \tan 50 - \tan^3 50}{1 - 3 \tan^2 50}
\]
Let $x = \tan 50$, that equation becomes:
\[
-\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}} = \frac{3 x- x^3}{1 - 3x^2} \Longrightarrow 3x^3 + 3\sqrt{3} x^2 - 9x - \sqrt{3} = 0.
\]

Define $f(x) := 3x^3 + 3\sqrt{3} x^2 - 9x - \sqrt{3}$, note that $\sqrt{3} > 1.7$.
$f(\sqrt{3}) = 9\sqrt{3} + 9\sqrt{3} - 9\sqrt{3} - \sqrt{3} > 9(1.7) - \sqrt{3} > 0$.

We can rewrite $f$ as $x(3x(x+\sqrt{3})-9)-\sqrt{3}$, so
$f(1.18) = 1.18(1.18\cdot 3(1.18+\sqrt{3})-9)-\sqrt{3} < 0$. By IVT, there is some $x \in (1.18,\sqrt{3})$
where $f(x) = 0$. So, $\tan 50 > 1.18$. Note that over the range $[0,\frac{\pi}{2})$, $\tan(\cdot)$ is monotonically
increasing, so if there is a root in that interval, it is unique.
 
\[tan(50) = tan(\frac{\pi}{4}+\frac{\pi}{36})=\frac{1+tan(
\frac{\pi}{36})}{1-tan(\frac{\pi}{36})} \\\\ tan(x)\approx x + \frac{1}{3}x^3 +...\;\; (MacLaurin \;series) \; gives: tan(x) > x \;\;for\;\; small\;\;positive \;\;x \\\\ Thus, I get: \\\\ tan(50) > \frac{1+\frac{\pi}{36}}{1-\frac{\pi}{36}}=\frac{36+\pi}{36-\pi}> \frac{36+3}{36-3}=39/33=13/11\approx 1.18\]
 
Hi magneto and lfdahl,

Thanks for the solution and participation to my challenge problem!:)

A solution I saw that is provided by other:

$\tan 50^{\circ}=\tan (45^{\circ}+5^{\circ})=\dfrac{\tan45^{\circ}+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan45^{\circ}\tan5^{\circ}}=\dfrac{1+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan5^{\circ}}$

But note that $\tan 5^{\circ}=\tan \left( \dfrac{\pi}{36} \right) >\dfrac{\pi}{36}>\dfrac{3}{36}=\dfrac{1}{12}$ which gives

$1+\tan 5^{\circ}>\dfrac{13}{12}$ and $\dfrac{1}{1-\tan 5^{\circ}}>\dfrac{12}{11}$

This implies $\dfrac{1+\tan5^{\circ}}{1-\tan5^{\circ}}>\dfrac{13}{11}$ so $\tan 50^{\circ}>\dfrac{13}{11}>1.18$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top