Trigonometric Simplification for Projectile Motion Equation

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Theia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the simplification of a trigonometric equation related to projectile motion under Newtonian gravity. The original equation, $$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$, where $$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$, was simplified to $$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$. Key manipulations included the use of trigonometric identities such as $$\cos^2 \alpha + \sin^2 \alpha = 1$$ and the double angle formulas. The simplification process involved strategic algebraic transformations and trigonometric substitutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric identities and formulas
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Knowledge of projectile motion principles in physics
  • Experience with Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) for equation simplification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study trigonometric identities, particularly double angle formulas
  • Learn about Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) like Mathematica or Maple for symbolic computation
  • Explore the physics of projectile motion under varying gravitational forces
  • Investigate advanced algebraic techniques for simplifying complex equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematicians, and engineers focusing on projectile motion analysis and trigonometric simplifications in their work.

Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Theia said:
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^

Hey Theia! ;)

Let's see...
$$(r - a)(\sin f - \tan α \cos f)^2 + r\tan α \cos f \cdot (\sin f - \tan α \cos f) + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(r-a)(\sin^2 f - 2\tan α \sin f\cos f + \tan^2α \cos^2 f) + r\tan α \cos f \sin f - r\tan^2 α \cos^2 f + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f - \tan^2α \cos^2 f + \tan^2 α)+ r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f + \tan^2 α(1 - \cos^2 f )) + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f - a (1 - \tan^2 α)\sin^2 f + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)2\sin α \cos α\cos f - 2a (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(2\sin α \cos α\cos f - (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f) - r (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(\sin 2α \cos f - \cos 2α\sin f) + r (\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α)\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\sin f = 0 \quad\vee\quad (2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f = 0 \\
$$
The "tricks" that we've used are:
$$
\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α = 1 \\
\sin 2α = 2\sin α\cos α \\
\cos 2α = \cos^2 α - \sin^2 α \\
\sin(α-β)=\sin α\cos β - \cos α \sin β
$$
 
Wow! Thank you so much! It looks like the key was some not so obvious manipulations to the equation. *wonders why it is so difficult to add 0 sometimes... :D *

As a side note, this equation was part of my study how to describe projectile motion under Newtonian $$-\gamma \tfrac{Mm}{r^2}$$ gravity (e.g. on Moon) without messing too much with celestial mechanics. Everything else went smoothly, except this simplification... But once the numerics worked, I didn't pay attention to it until now. :D Thank you again!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
923
Replies
2
Views
2K