MHB Trigonometric Simplification for Projectile Motion Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Theia said:
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^

Hey Theia! ;)

Let's see...
$$(r - a)(\sin f - \tan α \cos f)^2 + r\tan α \cos f \cdot (\sin f - \tan α \cos f) + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(r-a)(\sin^2 f - 2\tan α \sin f\cos f + \tan^2α \cos^2 f) + r\tan α \cos f \sin f - r\tan^2 α \cos^2 f + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f - \tan^2α \cos^2 f + \tan^2 α)+ r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f + \tan^2 α(1 - \cos^2 f )) + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f - a (1 - \tan^2 α)\sin^2 f + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)2\sin α \cos α\cos f - 2a (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(2\sin α \cos α\cos f - (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f) - r (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(\sin 2α \cos f - \cos 2α\sin f) + r (\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α)\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\sin f = 0 \quad\vee\quad (2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f = 0 \\
$$
The "tricks" that we've used are:
$$
\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α = 1 \\
\sin 2α = 2\sin α\cos α \\
\cos 2α = \cos^2 α - \sin^2 α \\
\sin(α-β)=\sin α\cos β - \cos α \sin β
$$
 
Wow! Thank you so much! It looks like the key was some not so obvious manipulations to the equation. *wonders why it is so difficult to add 0 sometimes... :D *

As a side note, this equation was part of my study how to describe projectile motion under Newtonian $$-\gamma \tfrac{Mm}{r^2}$$ gravity (e.g. on Moon) without messing too much with celestial mechanics. Everything else went smoothly, except this simplification... But once the numerics worked, I didn't pay attention to it until now. :D Thank you again!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top