MHB Trigonometric Simplification for Projectile Motion Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a trigonometric equation related to projectile motion. The original equation involves terms with respect to the variable f and includes a substitution for L. A participant confirms that the equation can indeed be simplified to a form involving secant and sine functions, using key trigonometric identities. The simplification process requires careful manipulation of the terms, highlighting the importance of recognizing fundamental trigonometric relationships. The equation is part of a broader study on projectile motion under specific gravitational conditions.
Theia
Messages
121
Reaction score
1
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Theia said:
Hi!

Long ago (more than 5 years now, actually) I got stuck with a trigonometrig formula and I haven't been able to got the point. I had an equation (with respect to $$f$$):

$$(r - a)L^2 + r\tan \alpha \cos f \cdot L + a\tan^2 \alpha = 0$$,

where

$$L = \sin f - \tan \alpha \cos f$$.

According to my partially lost notes, some CAS has been simplified this into

$$\tfrac{1}{2} \sec ^2 \alpha \sin f [(2a - r)\sin (2\alpha - f) + r\sin f] = 0$$.

Now I'd like to ask you, is this true at all? And if it is true, what tricks(?) were used? Thank you so much! ^^

Hey Theia! ;)

Let's see...
$$(r - a)(\sin f - \tan α \cos f)^2 + r\tan α \cos f \cdot (\sin f - \tan α \cos f) + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(r-a)(\sin^2 f - 2\tan α \sin f\cos f + \tan^2α \cos^2 f) + r\tan α \cos f \sin f - r\tan^2 α \cos^2 f + a\tan^2 α = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f - \tan^2α \cos^2 f + \tan^2 α)+ r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f + a(-\sin^2 f + \tan^2 α(1 - \cos^2 f )) + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
(2a-r)\tan α \cos f \sin f - a (1 - \tan^2 α)\sin^2 f + r\sin^2 f = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)2\sin α \cos α\cos f - 2a (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(2\sin α \cos α\cos f - (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f) - r (\cos^2 α - \sin^2 α)\sin f + 2r\cos^2 α\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)(\sin 2α \cos f - \cos 2α\sin f) + r (\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α)\sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\frac 12 \sec^2 α \sin f\Big[(2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f \Big] = 0 \\
\sin f = 0 \quad\vee\quad (2a-r)\sin(2α - f) + r \sin f = 0 \\
$$
The "tricks" that we've used are:
$$
\cos^2 α + \sin^2 α = 1 \\
\sin 2α = 2\sin α\cos α \\
\cos 2α = \cos^2 α - \sin^2 α \\
\sin(α-β)=\sin α\cos β - \cos α \sin β
$$
 
Wow! Thank you so much! It looks like the key was some not so obvious manipulations to the equation. *wonders why it is so difficult to add 0 sometimes... :D *

As a side note, this equation was part of my study how to describe projectile motion under Newtonian $$-\gamma \tfrac{Mm}{r^2}$$ gravity (e.g. on Moon) without messing too much with celestial mechanics. Everything else went smoothly, except this simplification... But once the numerics worked, I didn't pay attention to it until now. :D Thank you again!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top