Suppose we have two operators A and B, such that they are both hermitian with eigenvalues ai and bi. We construct a new operator like this C=A +iB, where i is the imaginary unity. Operator C is observable in the sense that it is measurable. Yes, if we measure A and B (suppose for simplicity that they commute) we get that the measured value of C is a+ib. Thus we obtain an OBSERVABLE with complex eigenvalues, in contradiction with the 3rd postulates wich states that all observable quantities are associated with hermitian operators with complete bases of eigenstates, bla bla. Kinda stupid but it works.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trivial contradiction to the 3rd postulate

Loading...

Similar Threads for Trivial contradiction postulate | Date |
---|---|

I Why do I get to a contradiction? | Apr 25, 2017 |

A Path integral formula for a state with non-trivial time dependency | Feb 3, 2017 |

SU(N) symmetry breaking by non-trivial parity. | May 17, 2015 |

What is trivial and non-trivial gate in computing? | Dec 19, 2014 |

Trivial spin problem | Apr 19, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**