Trouble taking Raman spectra in solution.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pills07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Raman Spectra
Pills07
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!
I´m new to the forum and to start participating and being part of it I have the following problem and question:

I began using a dispersive Raman system and I got spectra of Rhodamine B and heparin sodium (and anticoagulant and glycosaminoglycan) in solid form and the spectra are good,but when I take the following:
1.Rhodamine B dissolved in ethanol and deionized water.
2.Heparin dissolved in deionized water and benzyl alcohol.

I get the solvents spectra,which to me is kinda weird because at least water is supposed to be a weak Raman scatterer.To prove that I got the wrong spectra to say it somehow I took spectra of the solvents alone and what I tried to do was subtracting the spectra (as done in UV-Vis spectroscopy) still I couldn´t see any of the peaks typical for heparin nor Rhodamine.
The system used is a Renishaw InVia Raman microscope,the spectra are taken at standard and ambient conditions,we have three lasers 457 nm,515 nm and 785 nm,I used the last one.I put the samples on an eppendorf cover (in an upside down position so the liquid sample can be poured in it) because we have no sample holders nor cells available for now.
So what am I doing wrong?,is it the way the I prepare the sample,would I have to do anything regarding the laser handling? what do you think? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I correct,sorry:
actually they are 4 solutions,if someone reads it as I have it in the original post then it can be thought it´s a mixture,so the four solutions I am having trouble with are:
1.Rhodamine B in ethanol.
2.Rhodamine B in deionized water.
3.Heparin in deionized water.
4.Heparin in benzyl alcohol.
 
I will suggest the obvious first; perhaps the solution is too dilute?

Claude.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top